Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief

Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance Order - "Deliberate Cheating" in Marriage Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Bench of Madurai, upheld an order granting maintenance in a marriage and paternity dispute case. The court, while delivering the judgment, referred to evidence of "deliberate cheating" by the respondent. The decision was rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Murali Shankar on June 26, 2023.

The case, Criminal Revision Petition No. 417 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4388 of 2021, involved Loyola Selva Kumar and M. Sharon Nisha as the petitioners and Minor L. Rayon John as the respondent. The petitioner sought maintenance for herself and her minor daughter under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The court, in its order, acknowledged the evidence presented by the first respondent, including photographs and messages, and cited Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, which allows the court to admit evidence that may assist in dealing with a dispute, regardless of its admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act.

High Court stated, "The respondent's deliberate cheating and fraudulent intention can very well be gathered from the stand of the respondent... the respondent openly stated that without giving Rs.25 lakhs as additional dowry, he will not live together with the first petitioner."

The court also referred to a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Badshah Vs. Urmila Badshah Godse, which held that when a man marries a woman while keeping her unaware of his existing marriage, she should be treated as his wife for the purpose of maintenance.

Regarding the quantum of maintenance, the court considered the economic scenario and the parties' status. The maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- for each of the respondents was deemed reasonable based on the evidence and financial status presented.

The judgment emphasizes the court's duty to achieve social justice and bridge the gap between the law and society. The court's decision highlights the importance of considering the circumstances and protecting the rights of marginalized sections of society.

The ruling sets a precedent in cases where deliberate cheating and fraudulent intentions are involved in marriage disputes. The judgment sends a strong message that such actions will not be tolerated and that maintenance obligations will be upheld.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2023

Loyola Selva Kumar vs  M.Sharon Nisha

Similar News