Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance Order - "Deliberate Cheating" in Marriage Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Bench of Madurai, upheld an order granting maintenance in a marriage and paternity dispute case. The court, while delivering the judgment, referred to evidence of "deliberate cheating" by the respondent. The decision was rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Murali Shankar on June 26, 2023.

The case, Criminal Revision Petition No. 417 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4388 of 2021, involved Loyola Selva Kumar and M. Sharon Nisha as the petitioners and Minor L. Rayon John as the respondent. The petitioner sought maintenance for herself and her minor daughter under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The court, in its order, acknowledged the evidence presented by the first respondent, including photographs and messages, and cited Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, which allows the court to admit evidence that may assist in dealing with a dispute, regardless of its admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act.

High Court stated, "The respondent's deliberate cheating and fraudulent intention can very well be gathered from the stand of the respondent... the respondent openly stated that without giving Rs.25 lakhs as additional dowry, he will not live together with the first petitioner."

The court also referred to a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Badshah Vs. Urmila Badshah Godse, which held that when a man marries a woman while keeping her unaware of his existing marriage, she should be treated as his wife for the purpose of maintenance.

Regarding the quantum of maintenance, the court considered the economic scenario and the parties' status. The maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- for each of the respondents was deemed reasonable based on the evidence and financial status presented.

The judgment emphasizes the court's duty to achieve social justice and bridge the gap between the law and society. The court's decision highlights the importance of considering the circumstances and protecting the rights of marginalized sections of society.

The ruling sets a precedent in cases where deliberate cheating and fraudulent intentions are involved in marriage disputes. The judgment sends a strong message that such actions will not be tolerated and that maintenance obligations will be upheld.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2023

Loyola Selva Kumar vs  M.Sharon Nisha

Latest Legal News