At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance Order - "Deliberate Cheating" in Marriage Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Bench of Madurai, upheld an order granting maintenance in a marriage and paternity dispute case. The court, while delivering the judgment, referred to evidence of "deliberate cheating" by the respondent. The decision was rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Murali Shankar on June 26, 2023.

The case, Criminal Revision Petition No. 417 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4388 of 2021, involved Loyola Selva Kumar and M. Sharon Nisha as the petitioners and Minor L. Rayon John as the respondent. The petitioner sought maintenance for herself and her minor daughter under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The court, in its order, acknowledged the evidence presented by the first respondent, including photographs and messages, and cited Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, which allows the court to admit evidence that may assist in dealing with a dispute, regardless of its admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act.

High Court stated, "The respondent's deliberate cheating and fraudulent intention can very well be gathered from the stand of the respondent... the respondent openly stated that without giving Rs.25 lakhs as additional dowry, he will not live together with the first petitioner."

The court also referred to a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Badshah Vs. Urmila Badshah Godse, which held that when a man marries a woman while keeping her unaware of his existing marriage, she should be treated as his wife for the purpose of maintenance.

Regarding the quantum of maintenance, the court considered the economic scenario and the parties' status. The maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- for each of the respondents was deemed reasonable based on the evidence and financial status presented.

The judgment emphasizes the court's duty to achieve social justice and bridge the gap between the law and society. The court's decision highlights the importance of considering the circumstances and protecting the rights of marginalized sections of society.

The ruling sets a precedent in cases where deliberate cheating and fraudulent intentions are involved in marriage disputes. The judgment sends a strong message that such actions will not be tolerated and that maintenance obligations will be upheld.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2023

Loyola Selva Kumar vs  M.Sharon Nisha

Latest Legal News