Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance Order - "Deliberate Cheating" in Marriage Dispute

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court, Bench of Madurai, upheld an order granting maintenance in a marriage and paternity dispute case. The court, while delivering the judgment, referred to evidence of "deliberate cheating" by the respondent. The decision was rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Murali Shankar on June 26, 2023.

The case, Criminal Revision Petition No. 417 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4388 of 2021, involved Loyola Selva Kumar and M. Sharon Nisha as the petitioners and Minor L. Rayon John as the respondent. The petitioner sought maintenance for herself and her minor daughter under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The court, in its order, acknowledged the evidence presented by the first respondent, including photographs and messages, and cited Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, which allows the court to admit evidence that may assist in dealing with a dispute, regardless of its admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act.

High Court stated, "The respondent's deliberate cheating and fraudulent intention can very well be gathered from the stand of the respondent... the respondent openly stated that without giving Rs.25 lakhs as additional dowry, he will not live together with the first petitioner."

The court also referred to a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Badshah Vs. Urmila Badshah Godse, which held that when a man marries a woman while keeping her unaware of his existing marriage, she should be treated as his wife for the purpose of maintenance.

Regarding the quantum of maintenance, the court considered the economic scenario and the parties' status. The maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- for each of the respondents was deemed reasonable based on the evidence and financial status presented.

The judgment emphasizes the court's duty to achieve social justice and bridge the gap between the law and society. The court's decision highlights the importance of considering the circumstances and protecting the rights of marginalized sections of society.

The ruling sets a precedent in cases where deliberate cheating and fraudulent intentions are involved in marriage disputes. The judgment sends a strong message that such actions will not be tolerated and that maintenance obligations will be upheld.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2023

Loyola Selva Kumar vs  M.Sharon Nisha

Latest Legal News