Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Madras High Court Suspends Tax Recovery, Orders Thorough Investigation on Alleged Misuse of Tax Login ID

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras, presided over by the Honourable Mr. Justice C. Saravanan, has ordered a suspension of tax recovery proceedings against M/s. Shewil Trading Company. This decision, pronounced on 02.11.2023, comes in the wake of allegations of unauthorized use of the company’s login credentials for tax filings.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, contested a recovery notice issued by the Commercial Taxes Department, seeking to recover a sum of Rs.11,63,24,233/- for the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The crux of the dispute centered around the claim that the petitioner did not receive a copy of the assessment order before the issuance of the recovery notice and had faced issues with the electronic filing system, leading to manual submissions.

In a key observation, Justice Saravanan highlighted, “The status of the investigation pursuant to the above FIR registered based on the complaint of the petitioner is not known.” This statement underscored the uncertainty surrounding the allegations of misuse of the petitioner’s login ID, prompting the court to call for a detailed investigation.

The court drew parallels with a similar case, W.P.Nos.37044 & 37045 of 2016 involving M/s. Hansa Enterprises, where the misuse of login ID was alleged. Emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation, the court directed the Commercial Tax Officer, in coordination with the Cyber Crime Cell, to investigate the authenticity of the petitioner’s claims.

While the investigation, which is to be completed within 18 months, is underway, the court has ordered that all revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner be held in abeyance. Furthermore, the assets of the petitioner shall remain attached as a precautionary measure.

Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, representing the respondents, was present during the proceedings. The court’s decision marks a critical juncture in addressing the complexities arising from digital transactions and cybersecurity in the realm of taxation.

Date of Decision: 02.11.2023

M/s.Shewil Trading Company VS .The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Latest Legal News