Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Madras High Court Suspends Tax Recovery, Orders Thorough Investigation on Alleged Misuse of Tax Login ID

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras, presided over by the Honourable Mr. Justice C. Saravanan, has ordered a suspension of tax recovery proceedings against M/s. Shewil Trading Company. This decision, pronounced on 02.11.2023, comes in the wake of allegations of unauthorized use of the company’s login credentials for tax filings.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, contested a recovery notice issued by the Commercial Taxes Department, seeking to recover a sum of Rs.11,63,24,233/- for the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The crux of the dispute centered around the claim that the petitioner did not receive a copy of the assessment order before the issuance of the recovery notice and had faced issues with the electronic filing system, leading to manual submissions.

In a key observation, Justice Saravanan highlighted, “The status of the investigation pursuant to the above FIR registered based on the complaint of the petitioner is not known.” This statement underscored the uncertainty surrounding the allegations of misuse of the petitioner’s login ID, prompting the court to call for a detailed investigation.

The court drew parallels with a similar case, W.P.Nos.37044 & 37045 of 2016 involving M/s. Hansa Enterprises, where the misuse of login ID was alleged. Emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation, the court directed the Commercial Tax Officer, in coordination with the Cyber Crime Cell, to investigate the authenticity of the petitioner’s claims.

While the investigation, which is to be completed within 18 months, is underway, the court has ordered that all revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner be held in abeyance. Furthermore, the assets of the petitioner shall remain attached as a precautionary measure.

Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, representing the respondents, was present during the proceedings. The court’s decision marks a critical juncture in addressing the complexities arising from digital transactions and cybersecurity in the realm of taxation.

Date of Decision: 02.11.2023

M/s.Shewil Trading Company VS .The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Latest Legal News