Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Madras High Court Suspends Tax Recovery, Orders Thorough Investigation on Alleged Misuse of Tax Login ID

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Madras, presided over by the Honourable Mr. Justice C. Saravanan, has ordered a suspension of tax recovery proceedings against M/s. Shewil Trading Company. This decision, pronounced on 02.11.2023, comes in the wake of allegations of unauthorized use of the company’s login credentials for tax filings.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, contested a recovery notice issued by the Commercial Taxes Department, seeking to recover a sum of Rs.11,63,24,233/- for the assessment years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The crux of the dispute centered around the claim that the petitioner did not receive a copy of the assessment order before the issuance of the recovery notice and had faced issues with the electronic filing system, leading to manual submissions.

In a key observation, Justice Saravanan highlighted, “The status of the investigation pursuant to the above FIR registered based on the complaint of the petitioner is not known.” This statement underscored the uncertainty surrounding the allegations of misuse of the petitioner’s login ID, prompting the court to call for a detailed investigation.

The court drew parallels with a similar case, W.P.Nos.37044 & 37045 of 2016 involving M/s. Hansa Enterprises, where the misuse of login ID was alleged. Emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation, the court directed the Commercial Tax Officer, in coordination with the Cyber Crime Cell, to investigate the authenticity of the petitioner’s claims.

While the investigation, which is to be completed within 18 months, is underway, the court has ordered that all revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner be held in abeyance. Furthermore, the assets of the petitioner shall remain attached as a precautionary measure.

Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, representing the respondents, was present during the proceedings. The court’s decision marks a critical juncture in addressing the complexities arising from digital transactions and cybersecurity in the realm of taxation.

Date of Decision: 02.11.2023

M/s.Shewil Trading Company VS .The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Latest Legal News