Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Madras High Court Grants Conditional Bail in DUI Case: "Proportional Compensation and Strict Compliance Essential"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on March 13, 2024, the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, granted bail to Saran Prabakar, who was arrested for driving under the influence and causing substantial property damage. The case, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Motor Vehicles Act, highlights the stringent measures taken by the judiciary in cases involving traffic violations and public safety.

Justice Karthikeyan emphasized the importance of proportional compensation and strict adherence to bail conditions in such cases. "The petitioner shall not abscond either during the investigation or trial," he stated, underlining the court's stance on ensuring justice and responsibility. The conditions set forth for bail include a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, daily reporting to the police, and a compensation deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 for the victims.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over road safety and the accountability of offenders in traffic-related offenses. The court's directive to distribute the compensation amount to the victims proportionally, as well as the strict conditions imposed on the petitioner, reflect a robust approach to such cases.

The ruling also sets a precedent in terms of the consequences for breaching bail conditions. Justice Karthikeyan referred to the case of P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala to underline the legal implications of failing to comply with the court's orders.

The case of Saran Prabakar serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding the law while balancing the rights of the accused with the wider public interest. The Madras High Court's judgment in this matter is expected to influence future cases involving traffic violations and public safety.

Date of Decision: 13-03-2024

SARAN PRABAKAR VERSUS STATE

Latest Legal News