MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |    

Madras High Court Grants Conditional Bail in DUI Case: "Proportional Compensation and Strict Compliance Essential"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on March 13, 2024, the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, granted bail to Saran Prabakar, who was arrested for driving under the influence and causing substantial property damage. The case, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Motor Vehicles Act, highlights the stringent measures taken by the judiciary in cases involving traffic violations and public safety.

Justice Karthikeyan emphasized the importance of proportional compensation and strict adherence to bail conditions in such cases. "The petitioner shall not abscond either during the investigation or trial," he stated, underlining the court's stance on ensuring justice and responsibility. The conditions set forth for bail include a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, daily reporting to the police, and a compensation deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 for the victims.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over road safety and the accountability of offenders in traffic-related offenses. The court's directive to distribute the compensation amount to the victims proportionally, as well as the strict conditions imposed on the petitioner, reflect a robust approach to such cases.

The ruling also sets a precedent in terms of the consequences for breaching bail conditions. Justice Karthikeyan referred to the case of P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala to underline the legal implications of failing to comply with the court's orders.

The case of Saran Prabakar serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding the law while balancing the rights of the accused with the wider public interest. The Madras High Court's judgment in this matter is expected to influence future cases involving traffic violations and public safety.

Date of Decision: 13-03-2024

SARAN PRABAKAR VERSUS STATE

Similar News