Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Application in Society Mismanagement Case: "Criminal Law Can Be Set Into Motion By Any Individual"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed an application seeking the quashment of an order involving allegations of misappropriation and forgery in the management of the Chanakya Kautilya Educational Institute. The order, dated March 20, 2024, was passed by Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia under Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6453 of 2017 and Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 54865 of 2023.

The case centered on disputes within the Society’s management, with accusations of financial misconduct amounting to over Rs. 2 crores. The complaint alleged that certain members had misappropriated funds, engaged in forgery, and illegally manipulated the Society's bank accounts and assets.

The Court observed, “It is well established principle of law that any person can set the criminal agency in motion.” This statement highlights the broader implication of the judgment, affirming the right of any individual to initiate criminal proceedings, irrespective of their official position within an organization.

Justice Ahluwalia further noted, “If the application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is rejected, then the only course available to the Magistrate is to proceed further with the complaint by recording statements of complainant and his witnesses under Sections 200, 2022 of Cr.P.C.” This clarification underscores the legal process where criminal complaints are to be considered even if a request for police investigation is denied.

Citing the Supreme Court’s position in similar cases, the judgment further reinforced that the presence of civil dispute elements does not preclude criminal proceedings. The Court stated, “...if allegation discloses the ingredients of civil dispute as well as ingredients of criminal dispute then it cannot be said that criminal action cannot be taken.”

The dismissal of the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. paves the way for the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the accused members of the Society, marking a crucial step in addressing the allegations of financial irregularities and misconduct within the institution. This judgment sets a precedent for handling cases where organizational disputes intertwine with allegations of criminal activity.

Date of Decision: March 20, 2024

AWADESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND OTHERS  Vs. SHISHIR KHARE

Latest Legal News