Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Application in Society Mismanagement Case: "Criminal Law Can Be Set Into Motion By Any Individual"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed an application seeking the quashment of an order involving allegations of misappropriation and forgery in the management of the Chanakya Kautilya Educational Institute. The order, dated March 20, 2024, was passed by Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia under Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6453 of 2017 and Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 54865 of 2023.

The case centered on disputes within the Society’s management, with accusations of financial misconduct amounting to over Rs. 2 crores. The complaint alleged that certain members had misappropriated funds, engaged in forgery, and illegally manipulated the Society's bank accounts and assets.

The Court observed, “It is well established principle of law that any person can set the criminal agency in motion.” This statement highlights the broader implication of the judgment, affirming the right of any individual to initiate criminal proceedings, irrespective of their official position within an organization.

Justice Ahluwalia further noted, “If the application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is rejected, then the only course available to the Magistrate is to proceed further with the complaint by recording statements of complainant and his witnesses under Sections 200, 2022 of Cr.P.C.” This clarification underscores the legal process where criminal complaints are to be considered even if a request for police investigation is denied.

Citing the Supreme Court’s position in similar cases, the judgment further reinforced that the presence of civil dispute elements does not preclude criminal proceedings. The Court stated, “...if allegation discloses the ingredients of civil dispute as well as ingredients of criminal dispute then it cannot be said that criminal action cannot be taken.”

The dismissal of the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. paves the way for the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the accused members of the Society, marking a crucial step in addressing the allegations of financial irregularities and misconduct within the institution. This judgment sets a precedent for handling cases where organizational disputes intertwine with allegations of criminal activity.

Date of Decision: March 20, 2024

AWADESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND OTHERS  Vs. SHISHIR KHARE

Latest Legal News