Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Application in Society Mismanagement Case: "Criminal Law Can Be Set Into Motion By Any Individual"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed an application seeking the quashment of an order involving allegations of misappropriation and forgery in the management of the Chanakya Kautilya Educational Institute. The order, dated March 20, 2024, was passed by Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia under Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6453 of 2017 and Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 54865 of 2023.

The case centered on disputes within the Society’s management, with accusations of financial misconduct amounting to over Rs. 2 crores. The complaint alleged that certain members had misappropriated funds, engaged in forgery, and illegally manipulated the Society's bank accounts and assets.

The Court observed, “It is well established principle of law that any person can set the criminal agency in motion.” This statement highlights the broader implication of the judgment, affirming the right of any individual to initiate criminal proceedings, irrespective of their official position within an organization.

Justice Ahluwalia further noted, “If the application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is rejected, then the only course available to the Magistrate is to proceed further with the complaint by recording statements of complainant and his witnesses under Sections 200, 2022 of Cr.P.C.” This clarification underscores the legal process where criminal complaints are to be considered even if a request for police investigation is denied.

Citing the Supreme Court’s position in similar cases, the judgment further reinforced that the presence of civil dispute elements does not preclude criminal proceedings. The Court stated, “...if allegation discloses the ingredients of civil dispute as well as ingredients of criminal dispute then it cannot be said that criminal action cannot be taken.”

The dismissal of the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. paves the way for the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the accused members of the Society, marking a crucial step in addressing the allegations of financial irregularities and misconduct within the institution. This judgment sets a precedent for handling cases where organizational disputes intertwine with allegations of criminal activity.

Date of Decision: March 20, 2024

AWADESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND OTHERS  Vs. SHISHIR KHARE

Similar News