CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Application in Society Mismanagement Case: "Criminal Law Can Be Set Into Motion By Any Individual"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed an application seeking the quashment of an order involving allegations of misappropriation and forgery in the management of the Chanakya Kautilya Educational Institute. The order, dated March 20, 2024, was passed by Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia under Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6453 of 2017 and Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 54865 of 2023.

The case centered on disputes within the Society’s management, with accusations of financial misconduct amounting to over Rs. 2 crores. The complaint alleged that certain members had misappropriated funds, engaged in forgery, and illegally manipulated the Society's bank accounts and assets.

The Court observed, “It is well established principle of law that any person can set the criminal agency in motion.” This statement highlights the broader implication of the judgment, affirming the right of any individual to initiate criminal proceedings, irrespective of their official position within an organization.

Justice Ahluwalia further noted, “If the application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is rejected, then the only course available to the Magistrate is to proceed further with the complaint by recording statements of complainant and his witnesses under Sections 200, 2022 of Cr.P.C.” This clarification underscores the legal process where criminal complaints are to be considered even if a request for police investigation is denied.

Citing the Supreme Court’s position in similar cases, the judgment further reinforced that the presence of civil dispute elements does not preclude criminal proceedings. The Court stated, “...if allegation discloses the ingredients of civil dispute as well as ingredients of criminal dispute then it cannot be said that criminal action cannot be taken.”

The dismissal of the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. paves the way for the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the accused members of the Society, marking a crucial step in addressing the allegations of financial irregularities and misconduct within the institution. This judgment sets a precedent for handling cases where organizational disputes intertwine with allegations of criminal activity.

Date of Decision: March 20, 2024

AWADESH NARAYAN TIWARI AND OTHERS  Vs. SHISHIR KHARE

Latest Legal News