Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Sentence Cannot Be Reduced to Two Months for Four Life-Threatening Stab Wounds: Supreme Court Restores 3-Year RI in Attempt to Murder Case Suspicion, However Grave, Cannot Substitute Proof: Apex Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 106 IEA Accused at the Time of the Statement Was Not in the Custody of the Police - Discovery Statement Held Inadmissible Under Section 27: Supreme Court Failure to Explain What Happened After ‘Last Seen Together’ Becomes an Additional Link: Supreme Court Strengthens Section 106 Evidence Act Doctrine Suicide in a Pact Is Conditional Upon Mutual Participation — Survivor’s Resolve Reinforces the Act: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Participation in Draw Does Not Cure Illegality: Supreme Court Rejects Estoppel in Arbitrary Flat Allotment Case Nepotism and Self-Aggrandizement Are Anathema to a Democratic System: Supreme Court Quashes Allotment of Super Deluxe Flats by Government Employees’ Welfare Society Liberty Is Not Absolute When It Becomes a Threat to Society: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Alleged ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Mastermind Magistrate’s Power Is Limited — Sessions Court May Yet Try the Case: Supreme Court Corrects High Court’s Misconception in ₹6.5 Crore Fraud Bail Order Dacoity Cannot Be Presumed, It Must Be Proved: Allahabad High Court Acquits Villagers After 43 Years, Citing ‘Glaring Lapses’ in Prosecution Case When the Judge Signs with the Prosecutor, Justice Is Already Compromised: MP High Court Quashes Tainted Medical College Enquiry Strict Rules Of Evidence Do Not Apply To Proceedings Before The Family Court: Kerala High Court Upholds Wife’s Claim For Gold And Money Commission Workers Cannot Claim Status of Civil Servants: Gujarat High Court Declines Regularization of Physically Challenged Case-Paper Operators Non-Wearing of Helmet Had a Direct Nexus with Fatal Head Injuries  : Madras High Court Upholds 25% Contributory Negligence for Helmet Violation Only a ‘Person Aggrieved’ Can Prosecute Defamation – Political Party Must Be Properly Represented: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Rahul Gandhi

"Lower Court Ignored Provisions of Section 210 of the Cr.P.C": High Court Stays Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has stayed the proceedings in a dowry harassment and assault case involving Mohammad Ayub Rizvi and others. The Court expressed concerns over the procedural correctness of the trial, stating that the "lower court ignored provisions of Section 210 of the Cr.P.C" in its summoning order.

The case had been filed under Sections 498-A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition (DP) Act. Mohammad Ayub Rizvi and others had applied to the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) to quash the summoning order and stay the proceedings related to the criminal case.

Legal representatives for Rizvi and others argued that the lower court's summoning order contained procedural lapses, citing violations of Sections 202 and 210 of the Cr.P.C. The High Court observed that while the lower court did not violate Section 202 of the Cr.P.C, it did ignore the provisions of Section 210.

In its judgment, the High Court emphasized that applying one's mind before issuing summons was crucial. The Court relied on Supreme Court judgments to underline this point, stating, "the importance of applying one’s mind before issuing summons, as per Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C, cannot be understated."

Citing these concerns, the High Court upheld the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C and directed a re-examination of the summoning order issued by the lower court. Pending this re-examination, the proceedings have been stayed.

This ruling highlights the High Court's vigilance in ensuring that lower courts adhere to procedural norms, safeguarding the rights of the accused. Legal experts believe that the judgment may serve as a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: 11th September 2023

Mohammad Ayub Rizvi And Others   vs Smt. Salma Khan And Another

Latest Legal News