Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Locus Of Plaintiff Upheld Based on Its Registered Society Status And Unchallenged Registration - Punjab And Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivered a judgment today that reaffirms the rights of a registered society to maintain control over a religious property. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN presided over the case, RSA No.1872 of 2022 (O&M) and issued a decisive ruling on a suit for injunction.

The case revolved around a dispute involving the Piyau Bhood Wali Habib Patti Masjid Committee, a registered society under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012. The Committee filed a suit for injunction against the defendant-appellants, alleging their interference in the control and management of a Masjid property used for religious purposes.

The defendant-appellants contested the plaintiff-respondent's ownership and locus standi, asserting that their ancestors had been managing the Masjid for generations. They challenged the plaintiff's right to bring the suit. However, the Trial Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and the Lower Appellate Court upheld this decision.

Justice Alka Sarin, in her oral observation, stated, "The plaintiff/respondent-Society had approached the Court by showing their locus standi to file the present suit by placing and proving on record the revised certificate of registration of the Society." She emphasized that the defendant-appellants had failed to provide evidence to prove their ownership or management of the Masjid.

Date of Decision: 12.01.2024

Shahid Hussen and Another VS Piyau Bhood Wali Habib Patti Badullan

 

Latest Legal News