Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |    

Locus Of Plaintiff Upheld Based on Its Registered Society Status And Unchallenged Registration - Punjab And Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivered a judgment today that reaffirms the rights of a registered society to maintain control over a religious property. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN presided over the case, RSA No.1872 of 2022 (O&M) and issued a decisive ruling on a suit for injunction.

The case revolved around a dispute involving the Piyau Bhood Wali Habib Patti Masjid Committee, a registered society under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012. The Committee filed a suit for injunction against the defendant-appellants, alleging their interference in the control and management of a Masjid property used for religious purposes.

The defendant-appellants contested the plaintiff-respondent's ownership and locus standi, asserting that their ancestors had been managing the Masjid for generations. They challenged the plaintiff's right to bring the suit. However, the Trial Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and the Lower Appellate Court upheld this decision.

Justice Alka Sarin, in her oral observation, stated, "The plaintiff/respondent-Society had approached the Court by showing their locus standi to file the present suit by placing and proving on record the revised certificate of registration of the Society." She emphasized that the defendant-appellants had failed to provide evidence to prove their ownership or management of the Masjid.

Date of Decision: 12.01.2024

Shahid Hussen and Another VS Piyau Bhood Wali Habib Patti Badullan

 

Similar News