Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Liberal and Justice-Oriented Approach Required in Condonation of Delay: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India reiterated the importance of adopting a "liberal and justice-oriented approach" when considering applications for the condonation of delay. The ruling, delivered on October 9, 2023, emphasized the need to balance technical considerations with the broader goal of achieving substantial justice.

The judgment, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Dipankar Datta, cited various precedents and discussed the principles governing the condonation of delay, particularly in cases involving the government as a party.

The Court acknowledged that the power to condone delay is a discretionary one and should depend on the sufficiency of the cause presented and the acceptability of the explanation offered. The length of the delay was considered immaterial, and the Court made a clear distinction between an "explanation" and an "excuse."

The judgment highlighted the challenges faced by the government in presenting appeals within the prescribed period of limitation due to the impersonal nature of its functioning and the bureaucratic process involved in decision-making. It underscored the need to avoid nit-picking individual defaults at the expense of collective interests and public justice.

Justice Trivedi and Justice Datta's ruling also noted that while the law of limitation is based on public policy, a mere lapse on the part of a litigant should not automatically lead to the denial of condonation of delay, as this could result in a miscarriage of justice.

The Court ultimately upheld the High Court's exercise of discretion in favor of condoning the delay in the case before them, emphasizing that the High Court had considered various factors, including the elastic nature of "sufficient cause" and the explanations provided for the delay. The judgment concluded that there was no clear error in the High Court's decision.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the courts' commitment to ensuring that substantive rights of both private parties and the state are not thwarted by technicalities, provided that sufficient cause is demonstrated. It reaffirms the importance of a balanced and pragmatic approach to the condonation of delay, particularly when public interest is at stake.

The ruling, which draws from a rich tapestry of legal precedents, sends a clear message that the courts will continue to prioritize justice and fairness in their decisions, even in cases involving governmental entities.

 Date of Decision: 9th October 2023

SHEO RAJ SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.  

                                              

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-SHEO-RAJ-SINGH-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News