Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Liberal and Justice-Oriented Approach Required in Condonation of Delay: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India reiterated the importance of adopting a "liberal and justice-oriented approach" when considering applications for the condonation of delay. The ruling, delivered on October 9, 2023, emphasized the need to balance technical considerations with the broader goal of achieving substantial justice.

The judgment, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Dipankar Datta, cited various precedents and discussed the principles governing the condonation of delay, particularly in cases involving the government as a party.

The Court acknowledged that the power to condone delay is a discretionary one and should depend on the sufficiency of the cause presented and the acceptability of the explanation offered. The length of the delay was considered immaterial, and the Court made a clear distinction between an "explanation" and an "excuse."

The judgment highlighted the challenges faced by the government in presenting appeals within the prescribed period of limitation due to the impersonal nature of its functioning and the bureaucratic process involved in decision-making. It underscored the need to avoid nit-picking individual defaults at the expense of collective interests and public justice.

Justice Trivedi and Justice Datta's ruling also noted that while the law of limitation is based on public policy, a mere lapse on the part of a litigant should not automatically lead to the denial of condonation of delay, as this could result in a miscarriage of justice.

The Court ultimately upheld the High Court's exercise of discretion in favor of condoning the delay in the case before them, emphasizing that the High Court had considered various factors, including the elastic nature of "sufficient cause" and the explanations provided for the delay. The judgment concluded that there was no clear error in the High Court's decision.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the courts' commitment to ensuring that substantive rights of both private parties and the state are not thwarted by technicalities, provided that sufficient cause is demonstrated. It reaffirms the importance of a balanced and pragmatic approach to the condonation of delay, particularly when public interest is at stake.

The ruling, which draws from a rich tapestry of legal precedents, sends a clear message that the courts will continue to prioritize justice and fairness in their decisions, even in cases involving governmental entities.

 Date of Decision: 9th October 2023

SHEO RAJ SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.  

                                              

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-SHEO-RAJ-SINGH-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News