Mutation Cannot Be Granted Solely on the Basis of a Will Without Civil Court Adjudication: Karnataka High Court Refusal to Cohabit for an Extended Period is Cruelty: Kerala High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Trademark Law Does Not Permit Dissecting a Composite Mark Into Individual Parts: Bombay High Court Overturns Refusal of ‘KHADI PRAKRITIK PAINT’ Device Mark Summary Security Force Court Should Be Convened Only in Cases of Grave and Imminent Necessity: Delhi High Court Quashes BSF Court-Martial, Orders Reinstatement of Ex-Constable A Registered Sale Deed Creates a Presumption of Valid Execution: Gujarat High Court Madras High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessments for Lack of Satisfaction Note Under Section 153C Repeated Bail Applications Without New Grounds Are an Abuse of Process: P&H High Court Denies Bail to Accused in ₹1.34 Crore Sextortion and Cyber Fraud Case Mere Recovery of Money Without Proof of Demand and Acceptance Insufficient for Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case A Registered FIR Delay is Not Always Fatal—Murder Conviction Sustained Based on Reliable Witness Testimonies: Punjab & Haryana High Court Supreme Court Strikes Down Income Tax Authorities' Rigid Interpretation of Compounding Guidelines Justice Cannot Be Selective: Supreme Court Orders SIT Probe into “One-Sided” Investigation of Suicide Case Following Inter-Religious Relationship Tragedy Mere Harsh Words Cannot Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 306 IPC General Allegations Against Extended Relatives in Dowry Harassment Cases Cannot Lead to Criminal Prosecution: Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Either Life Imprisonment or a Maximum of 10 Years – No Scope for 12 Years: Supreme Court Corrects High Court's Sentencing Error Legislature's Intent Clear: Dealers in Cooked Food Can Opt for 0.5% Tax on Resale Goods: Kerala High Court Review Powers Under Repealed Act Invalid, Says Punjab and Haryana High Court in Nestle Tax Case Last Seen Theory Without Corroboration Cannot Establish Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Raja Khan Loss of a Right Hand for a Labourer is a Near-Total Disability: Supreme Court Increases Motor Accident Compensation to ₹20.55 Lakh Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976; Allows Delegation of Permit Granting Powers to STA Secretary Insurance Cannot Be Denied on Arbitrary Technicalities: Supreme Court Slams National Insurance for Unfair Claim Rejection Possession Under a Void Transaction Ripens Into Adverse Ownership Over Time: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Legislature's Intent Clear: Dealers in Cooked Food Can Opt for 0.5% Tax on Resale Goods: Kerala High Court

08 February 2025 1:50 PM

By: sayum


High Court rules Section 8(c)(i) of KVAT Act permits dealers in cooked food to apply compounded tax rate on other goods. In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that dealers primarily engaged in the sale of cooked food and beverages are entitled to pay a compounded tax rate of 0.5% on their total turnover, including resale bakery products. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mr. Justice Syam Kumar V.M., overturns the decisions of lower tax authorities that had subjected such turnover to the standard rate under Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act.

The petitioner, Pentafour Associates, operated a commercial outlet selling bakery products and beverages in front of an amusement park. For the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15, the petitioner opted to pay tax at a compounded rate of 0.5% on the sale of goods as per Section 8(c)(i) of the KVAT Act. The Assessing Authority, however, taxed the resale bakery products at the regular rate under Section 6 of the Act, arguing that the compounded rate applied only to cooked food and beverages prepared by the dealer.

Scope of Section 8(c)(i): The court analyzed the provisions of Section 8(c)(i) and concluded that it permits dealers in cooked food and beverages to pay a compounded tax rate on both self-prepared items and other goods for which they are not the first taxable sellers. "An option is given to a dealer in cooked food and beverages, including beverages prepared by him, to pay tax at half percent of the turnover of cooked food and beverages prepared by him and also on the turnover of other goods," the judgment noted.

The bench emphasized the legislative intent behind the provision, stating that it aims to simplify tax compliance for dealers in cooked food by allowing a unified tax rate. "The purport of the Section appears to be to enable a dealer primarily dealing in cooked food and beverages to discharge his tax liability at the rate of 0.5% on his total turnover," the court observed.

Clarifying the term "other goods" in Section 8(c)(i), the court rejected the revenue's interpretation that it should only include similar items as cooked food and beverages. "The very purpose of the legislature using the words 'other goods' would be frustrated if the phrase is interpreted to refer to goods of the same nature," the judgment stated.

The court criticized the lower authorities for their restrictive interpretation of the statute, which led to an inconsistent application of tax rates. It underscored the importance of adhering to the clear language and intent of the legislature, which intended to provide a compounded tax rate for a broad category of items sold by eligible dealers.

Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar remarked, "So long as a substantial part of his turnover pertains to cooked food and beverages, including beverages prepared by him, he would be entitled to pay tax at the compounded rate even on the turnover of other goods incidentally sold by him in the course of business."

The Kerala High Court's judgment is a landmark decision that simplifies tax compliance for dealers in cooked food and beverages, reaffirming their eligibility to pay a compounded tax rate on a broader range of goods. This ruling is expected to have significant implications for similar cases, providing clarity and consistency in the application of the KVAT Act.

Date of Decision: May 24, 2024

 

Similar News