Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Landowners Entitled to Compensation for Road Construction, Rules Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Shimla, August 19, 2023  - In a significant judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, has ruled that landowners whose land has been utilized for road construction are entitled to compensation. The court’s decision came in response to a civil writ petition filed by Ram Dhan and another petitioner against the State of Himachal Pradesh.

The petitioners had approached the court seeking compensation for their land, which was used for the construction of the Jarol-Khai Ghat road via Behna. Despite the utilization of their land, the petitioners were not compensated, leading them to approach the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

In the judgment delivered on August 19, 2023, Justice Sandeep Sharma observed, “The State cannot dispossess a citizen of his property except in accordance with the procedure established by law.” The court categorically rejected the argument of delay and laches raised by the respondents, referring to the precedents set by judgments such as Vidya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2020) 2 SCC 569 and Sukh Dutt Ratra v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2022) 7 SCC 508.

Justice Sharma emphasized the constitutional and human right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and underscored the importance of access to roads in hilly areas. The court also referred to the State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajiv and others (Civil Appeal No. 1278 of 2023), where the issue of compensation for land utilized for road construction was discussed.

The judgment directed the respondents to initiate acquisition proceedings and award just and fair compensation to the petitioners within a stipulated timeframe. The court expressed hope that the authorities would expedite the resolution of the matter to address the petitioner’s rightful claim.

This ruling by the Himachal Pradesh High Court serves as a significant precedent for landowners whose property is utilized for public infrastructure projects. It reinforces the principle that individuals cannot be deprived of their property without proper compensation, in accordance with the law.

Decided on: August 19, 2023

Ram Dhan And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And

Latest Legal News