Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Landowners Entitled to Compensation for Road Construction, Rules Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Shimla, August 19, 2023  - In a significant judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, has ruled that landowners whose land has been utilized for road construction are entitled to compensation. The court’s decision came in response to a civil writ petition filed by Ram Dhan and another petitioner against the State of Himachal Pradesh.

The petitioners had approached the court seeking compensation for their land, which was used for the construction of the Jarol-Khai Ghat road via Behna. Despite the utilization of their land, the petitioners were not compensated, leading them to approach the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

In the judgment delivered on August 19, 2023, Justice Sandeep Sharma observed, “The State cannot dispossess a citizen of his property except in accordance with the procedure established by law.” The court categorically rejected the argument of delay and laches raised by the respondents, referring to the precedents set by judgments such as Vidya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2020) 2 SCC 569 and Sukh Dutt Ratra v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2022) 7 SCC 508.

Justice Sharma emphasized the constitutional and human right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and underscored the importance of access to roads in hilly areas. The court also referred to the State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajiv and others (Civil Appeal No. 1278 of 2023), where the issue of compensation for land utilized for road construction was discussed.

The judgment directed the respondents to initiate acquisition proceedings and award just and fair compensation to the petitioners within a stipulated timeframe. The court expressed hope that the authorities would expedite the resolution of the matter to address the petitioner’s rightful claim.

This ruling by the Himachal Pradesh High Court serves as a significant precedent for landowners whose property is utilized for public infrastructure projects. It reinforces the principle that individuals cannot be deprived of their property without proper compensation, in accordance with the law.

Decided on: August 19, 2023

Ram Dhan And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And

Latest Legal News