Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Landowners Entitled to Compensation for Road Construction, Rules Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Shimla, August 19, 2023  - In a significant judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, has ruled that landowners whose land has been utilized for road construction are entitled to compensation. The court’s decision came in response to a civil writ petition filed by Ram Dhan and another petitioner against the State of Himachal Pradesh.

The petitioners had approached the court seeking compensation for their land, which was used for the construction of the Jarol-Khai Ghat road via Behna. Despite the utilization of their land, the petitioners were not compensated, leading them to approach the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

In the judgment delivered on August 19, 2023, Justice Sandeep Sharma observed, “The State cannot dispossess a citizen of his property except in accordance with the procedure established by law.” The court categorically rejected the argument of delay and laches raised by the respondents, referring to the precedents set by judgments such as Vidya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2020) 2 SCC 569 and Sukh Dutt Ratra v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (2022) 7 SCC 508.

Justice Sharma emphasized the constitutional and human right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and underscored the importance of access to roads in hilly areas. The court also referred to the State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajiv and others (Civil Appeal No. 1278 of 2023), where the issue of compensation for land utilized for road construction was discussed.

The judgment directed the respondents to initiate acquisition proceedings and award just and fair compensation to the petitioners within a stipulated timeframe. The court expressed hope that the authorities would expedite the resolution of the matter to address the petitioner’s rightful claim.

This ruling by the Himachal Pradesh High Court serves as a significant precedent for landowners whose property is utilized for public infrastructure projects. It reinforces the principle that individuals cannot be deprived of their property without proper compensation, in accordance with the law.

Decided on: August 19, 2023

Ram Dhan And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And

Similar News