'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

"Landlord-Tenant Disputes are Arbitrable," Declares Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive ruling yesterday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court cleared the air around the arbitrability of landlord-tenant disputes. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill observed that such disputes can be settled through arbitration, further emphasizing that the "matter basically is in the nature of a landlord/tenant dispute." This observation is aligned with the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Vidya Drolia and others Vs. Durga Trading Corporation.

The petition was filed by Mala Kshetrapal through her attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra against Gunveen Singh, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner sought the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute.

Despite several notices, the respondent could not be served. However, the court found that the respondent was "duly served" via a member of his family and electronic means, as provided under Order 5 Rule 15 CPC. "In view of the aforesaid provisions and also the fact that respondent has also been physically served, and none has appeared on behalf of the respondent, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte," said the judgment.

The Court appointed Shri R.S. Virk, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.), as the sole Arbitrator, subject to his declaration under Section 12 of the Act concerning his independence and impartiality. The Arbitrator will be paid as per the Fourth Schedule of the Act or as mutually decided by the parties.

Justice Gill directed the parties to appear before the Arbitrator at the Arbitration Centre in Chandigarh on September 30, 2023, at 11:00 A.M. or any other date suitable to all concerned.

This ruling provides a framework for similar landlord-tenant disputes, endorsing the use of arbitration for quicker and perhaps more efficient resolution.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2023

Mala Kshetrapal Through Attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra vs Gunveen Singh          

Latest Legal News