Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"Landlord-Tenant Disputes are Arbitrable," Declares Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive ruling yesterday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court cleared the air around the arbitrability of landlord-tenant disputes. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill observed that such disputes can be settled through arbitration, further emphasizing that the "matter basically is in the nature of a landlord/tenant dispute." This observation is aligned with the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Vidya Drolia and others Vs. Durga Trading Corporation.

The petition was filed by Mala Kshetrapal through her attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra against Gunveen Singh, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner sought the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute.

Despite several notices, the respondent could not be served. However, the court found that the respondent was "duly served" via a member of his family and electronic means, as provided under Order 5 Rule 15 CPC. "In view of the aforesaid provisions and also the fact that respondent has also been physically served, and none has appeared on behalf of the respondent, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte," said the judgment.

The Court appointed Shri R.S. Virk, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.), as the sole Arbitrator, subject to his declaration under Section 12 of the Act concerning his independence and impartiality. The Arbitrator will be paid as per the Fourth Schedule of the Act or as mutually decided by the parties.

Justice Gill directed the parties to appear before the Arbitrator at the Arbitration Centre in Chandigarh on September 30, 2023, at 11:00 A.M. or any other date suitable to all concerned.

This ruling provides a framework for similar landlord-tenant disputes, endorsing the use of arbitration for quicker and perhaps more efficient resolution.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2023

Mala Kshetrapal Through Attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra vs Gunveen Singh          

Latest Legal News