Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’

"Landlord-Tenant Disputes are Arbitrable," Declares Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decisive ruling yesterday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court cleared the air around the arbitrability of landlord-tenant disputes. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill observed that such disputes can be settled through arbitration, further emphasizing that the "matter basically is in the nature of a landlord/tenant dispute." This observation is aligned with the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Vidya Drolia and others Vs. Durga Trading Corporation.

The petition was filed by Mala Kshetrapal through her attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra against Gunveen Singh, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner sought the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute.

Despite several notices, the respondent could not be served. However, the court found that the respondent was "duly served" via a member of his family and electronic means, as provided under Order 5 Rule 15 CPC. "In view of the aforesaid provisions and also the fact that respondent has also been physically served, and none has appeared on behalf of the respondent, the respondent is proceeded against ex parte," said the judgment.

The Court appointed Shri R.S. Virk, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.), as the sole Arbitrator, subject to his declaration under Section 12 of the Act concerning his independence and impartiality. The Arbitrator will be paid as per the Fourth Schedule of the Act or as mutually decided by the parties.

Justice Gill directed the parties to appear before the Arbitrator at the Arbitration Centre in Chandigarh on September 30, 2023, at 11:00 A.M. or any other date suitable to all concerned.

This ruling provides a framework for similar landlord-tenant disputes, endorsing the use of arbitration for quicker and perhaps more efficient resolution.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2023

Mala Kshetrapal Through Attorney Kanwal Preet Singh Bindra vs Gunveen Singh          

Latest Legal News