Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Land Acquisition Proceedings Not Lapsed Due to Possession or Compensation, Rules Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, 11th April 2023: In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that land acquisition proceedings for the construction of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway, a project of national importance, have not lapsed. The judgment, delivered in the case of Land and Building Department through Secretary & Anr. v. Attro Devi & Ors., clarified the interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case revolved around a writ petition filed by Attro Devi and others, who argued that the acquisition of their land had lapsed as neither possession nor compensation had been provided. The High Court had ruled in their favor, but the Supreme Court overturned the decision.

The apex court referred to its previous Constitution Bench judgment in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Others, where it was held that satisfaction of either taking possession of the acquired land or payment of compensation is sufficient to save the acquisition from lapsing under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

In this case, the Supreme Court found that the possession of the land in dispute was taken after the acquisition was complete, satisfying one of the conditions for saving the acquisition. The court further emphasized that the subject land was required for the construction of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway, which is part of the Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana.

While setting aside the High Court's order, the Supreme Court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to ensure that the respondents receive the rightful compensation as per their entitlement.

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for land acquisition cases, providing clarity on the conditions for the lapse of acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act. It also highlights the importance of national infrastructure projects and the need to strike a balance between development and landowners' rights.

The decision by the Supreme Court will enable the smooth progress of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway project, contributing to improved connectivity and infrastructure in the region.

Date of Judgment: 11th April 2023

LAND AND BUIILDING DEPARTMENT vs THROUGH SECRETARY & ANR.  ATTRO DEVI & ORS.                   

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/11-Apr-2023-LAND-AND-BUILDING-DEPARTMENT-Vs-ATTRO-DEVI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News