Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Land Acquisition Proceedings Not Lapsed Due to Possession or Compensation, Rules Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, 11th April 2023: In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that land acquisition proceedings for the construction of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway, a project of national importance, have not lapsed. The judgment, delivered in the case of Land and Building Department through Secretary & Anr. v. Attro Devi & Ors., clarified the interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

The case revolved around a writ petition filed by Attro Devi and others, who argued that the acquisition of their land had lapsed as neither possession nor compensation had been provided. The High Court had ruled in their favor, but the Supreme Court overturned the decision.

The apex court referred to its previous Constitution Bench judgment in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Others, where it was held that satisfaction of either taking possession of the acquired land or payment of compensation is sufficient to save the acquisition from lapsing under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

In this case, the Supreme Court found that the possession of the land in dispute was taken after the acquisition was complete, satisfying one of the conditions for saving the acquisition. The court further emphasized that the subject land was required for the construction of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway, which is part of the Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana.

While setting aside the High Court's order, the Supreme Court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to ensure that the respondents receive the rightful compensation as per their entitlement.

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for land acquisition cases, providing clarity on the conditions for the lapse of acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act. It also highlights the importance of national infrastructure projects and the need to strike a balance between development and landowners' rights.

The decision by the Supreme Court will enable the smooth progress of the Delhi-Saharanpur-Dehradun Highway project, contributing to improved connectivity and infrastructure in the region.

Date of Judgment: 11th April 2023

LAND AND BUIILDING DEPARTMENT vs THROUGH SECRETARY & ANR.  ATTRO DEVI & ORS.                   

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/11-Apr-2023-LAND-AND-BUILDING-DEPARTMENT-Vs-ATTRO-DEVI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News