Illegal Excavation | State Must Probe Offences Under MMDR & Forest Acts Along With General Penal Law, File Supplementary Chargesheet: Supreme Court Accused In Custody For 30 Months Out Of Maximum 3-Year Sentence Entitled To Bail Despite Criminal Antecedents If Trial Protracted: Supreme Court Section 17A PC Act | Prior Approval Not Required To Investigate Public Servant Accused Of Demanding Bribe: Supreme Court Town Planning Residential Zoning Cannot Override Bar On Patta Over Water Bodies; State Must Allot Alternate Site Before Demolishing Flats: Supreme Court Section 4A Census Act | Private Unaided Schools Not 'Local Authority', Teachers Cannot Be Requisitioned For Census Duty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Interim Stay SC/ST Act | Magistrate Recording Statements Under Sections 200 & 202 CrPC Before Transfer Is Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial: Allahabad High Court Ad Interim Attachment Order Under Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944 Lapses Automatically After One Year If Cognizance Not Taken: Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 306 IPC | Instigation Can Be Inferred From Continued Harassment, Absence Of Suicide Note No Ground For Discharge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Regular Bail May Be Granted Subject To Verification Of Past Criminal Antecedents In Property Offences: Orissa High Court Litigant Should Not Suffer For Counsel’s Illness: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Closing Evidence DV Act | Interim Stay Of Residence Order By Appellate Court Cannot Deprive Aged Parent Of Dignity And Shelter: Madras High Court Section 13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act | Mere Matrimonial Discord And Incompatibility Do Not Constitute 'Cruelty': Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Grant Of Anticipatory Bail Where Custodial Interrogation Is Unnecessary Despite Allegations Of Large-Scale Financial Irregularities: Kerala High Court Manipulated Seizure Memos and Inconsistent Testimonies Vitiate Prosecution Case Under NDPS Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 15 & 31 J&K Evacuee Property Act 1949 Do Not Bar Civil Court's Jurisdiction In Injunction Suits Between Private Parties: J&K High Court Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act | Court Can Grant Permanent Alimony Even On Oral Application While Passing Divorce Decree: Jharkhand High Court Co-Accused Has No Legal Right To Be Heard At The Stage Of Tendering Pardon: Delhi High Court Sale Proceeds Of Flats Constructed For Leasing Out Must Be Taxed As 'Capital Gains' And Not Business Income Merely Because Sale Followed Receipt Of OC: Bombay High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Seek Expert Opinion To Rebut Statutory Presumption When Signature On Cheque Is Admitted: Gujarat High Court Recruitment Rules Framed Under Administrative Necessity Are Not Subject To Norms Designed For Other Central Government Hospitals: Delhi High Court

Land Acquisition | Compensation Raised to Rs. 4,50,000 Per Acre for Land Acquired Under Hippargi Barrage Project - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, addressed appeals concerning the enhancement of compensation for land acquired under the Hippargi Barrage project. The central legal issue was the determination of the fair market value and statutory benefits owed to the appellants whose lands were acquired for the construction of canals.

The appellants, landowners of irrigated lands, were initially awarded compensation of Rs. 1,31,263 per acre by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (S.L.A.O.). Dissatisfied, they approached the Reference Court, which increased the market value to Rs. 3,00,000 per acre. Subsequent appeals and cross-objections by both parties led to a re-evaluation of the compensation amount. Notably, in a similar matter, the market value was set at Rs. 3,69,000 per acre, a decision previously confirmed by the Supreme Court.

Comparable Sales Method: The appellants sought compensation at Rs. 5,00,000 per acre, based on a High Court order for similar lands acquired during the same period under the same project. The Supreme Court noted the respondents' admission to the fairness of a market value of Rs. 3,69,000 per acre for acquisitions from 2004-2005.

Annual Escalation: Acknowledging an annual escalation rate of 5% applied from the fixed market value in 2004-2005, the court found it just to set the compensation for lands acquired in 2007 at Rs. 4,50,000 per acre, modifying an earlier High Court order.

Equitable Relief: The Court directed that the appellants be compensated at the enhanced rate with all statutory benefits, interest, and costs, though it upheld the High Court's decision to deny interest for delays in filing cross-objections.

Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, granting compensation at Rs. 4,50,000 per acre. It emphasized that the decision was based on the peculiar facts of the case and should not serve as a precedent for future claims.

Date of Decision: May 07, 2024

Shripal & Anr. vs Karnataka Neravari Nigam Ltd. & Anr.

Latest Legal News