Non-Disclosure Of Medical Deformity While Seeking Re-Appointment Amounts To Deliberate Suppression, Termination Restored: Supreme Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Suit Based On Unregistered Gift Deed Not Maintainable; Plaint Liable For Rejection: Andhra Pradesh High Court Accused Has No Blanket Immunity From Re-Arrest If Initial Arrest Was Declared Illegal Only On Technical Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Variation In Physical Signature No Ground To Reject Bid If Submitted Via Secure Digital Signature Certificate: Orissa High Court Management Cannot Re-Examine Selection After Candidate Alters Position By Leaving Previous Job: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of E-Way Bills Not Proof Of Physical Movement Of Goods; GST Registration Can Be Cancelled For Fake ITC Claims: Madras High Court Employer Cannot Abuse Unequal Bargaining Power To Deny Back Wages For Period Of Eligibility: Supreme Court Restores Dues Of MSRTC Employee Entire Bank Account Of Educational Institution Cannot Be Frozen Merely Because It Received Fees From Accused Parent: Karnataka High Court CARA Must Facilitate Relocation Of Children Adopted Under HAMA; Cannot Abdicate Responsibility By Issuing Mere 'Support Letters': Delhi High Court Valid Caste Certificate Issued By Competent Authority Is Sine Qua Non To Establish Offence Under SC/ST Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Shifting Defense From 'No Transaction' To 'Transaction Not Proved' Prima Facie Shows Dishonest Intent Since Inception: Calcutta High Court Sugar Exports Under Specific Permission Cannot Be Treated As 'Restricted' To Deny RoDTEP Benefits: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' SDO Cannot Reclassify Public Utility Land To Grant Private Leases; Such Pattas Are Void Ab Initio: Supreme Court DNA Test Report Prevails Over Presumption Of Legitimacy Under Section 112 Evidence Act If Report Is Undisputed: Supreme Court Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Reject Plaint Over Insufficient Court Fee Without Giving Mandatory Opportunity To Correct Valuation: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Illegal Encroachments On National Highways; Bans New Dhabas Within Right Of Way

Lack of Credible Evidence Leads to Acquittal in Counter Case – Karnataka High Court Upholds Conviction and Acquittal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice J.M. Khazi, upheld the conviction of S.H. Ramakrishnappa for the assault and attempted murder of Lokesh, and confirmed the acquittal of accused in a counter case, in a judgment that highlights the complexities of legal evidence evaluation in criminal cases.

The convoluted case, which stemmed from a land dispute in Sadahalli village, Bangalore North Taluk, involved two interlinked appeals – Criminal Appeal Nos. 1183 of 2013 and 978 of 2010. The court carefully dissected the incidents of assault that occurred in October 2007, leading to the conviction of S.H. Ramakrishnappa under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for a brutal attack on Lokesh using a club.

Justice J.M. Khazi, in the judgment, emphasized the significance of credible evidence in criminal proceedings, stating, “In the light of the overwhelming evidence placed on record by the prosecution, this Court is of the considered opinion that the fact that the blood-stained clothes of injured Lokesh were not seized by the Investigating Officer would not go to the root of the prosecution case.”

In a parallel development, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by S.R. Nagesh, challenging the acquittal of Lokesh and others in a counter case. The court observed substantial contradictions and lack of evidence against the accused, suggesting that the complaint was filed as a reactionary measure to the initial assault. “Considering the oral and documentary evidence placed on record, the trial Court has come to a correct conclusion that prosecution has failed to prove the allegations against the accused persons in Cr.No.112/2007 and acquitted them,” Justice Khazi noted.

Date of Decision: 13 DECEMBER, 2023

S R NAGESH VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

 

Latest Legal News