Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Kerala High Court Rules Engineering Degrees & Diplomas Not Equivalent to NTC for KSEB Meter Reader Posts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has declared that engineering degrees and diplomas cannot be considered equivalent or higher qualifications to the National Trade Certificate (NTC) in Electrician/Wireman/Electronics trade for the post of Meter Reader/Spot Biller in Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Amit Rawal and C.S. Sudha in the writ appeals No. 370 of 2023 and 398 of 2023 against the judgment in WP(C) No. 3383/2022 dated 7.12.2022 of the High Court of Kerala.

The appellants, Muhammed Naeem V.T and Nizamuddin Kochumanappuzha, challenged the inclusion of candidates with engineering degrees and diplomas in the KSEB rank list. The High Court observed that “Engineering degrees/diplomas not presupposing acquisition of NTC, hence not to be considered ‘higher qualification’ for this post.”

This landmark decision arises from the appeal against the dismissal of writ petitions that questioned the eligibility of engineering degree and diploma holders for the said posts. The court highlighted the necessity for clear demarcation of qualifications for specific job roles, stating, “Consideration of degrees and diplomas for positions meant for NTC holders could disadvantageously affect employment opportunities of NTC holders.”

The judgment also addressed the role of executive orders in determining the equivalence of qualifications. The court noted that the Ext.P11 order, declaring diploma courses in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as a higher qualification to NTC, is deemed inapplicable as “Change of qualification criteria post-notification not permissible.”

In its decision, the court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned judgment, and directed to recast the rank list excluding degree or diploma holders in engineering without the NTC as specified in the notification. This ruling underscores the court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of employment qualifications and ensuring fair opportunities for candidates holding specific vocational certifications.

Date of Decision: 17th November 2023

Muhammed Naeem V.T VS State of Kerala

Similar News