Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Kerala High Court Rules Engineering Degrees & Diplomas Not Equivalent to NTC for KSEB Meter Reader Posts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has declared that engineering degrees and diplomas cannot be considered equivalent or higher qualifications to the National Trade Certificate (NTC) in Electrician/Wireman/Electronics trade for the post of Meter Reader/Spot Biller in Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Amit Rawal and C.S. Sudha in the writ appeals No. 370 of 2023 and 398 of 2023 against the judgment in WP(C) No. 3383/2022 dated 7.12.2022 of the High Court of Kerala.

The appellants, Muhammed Naeem V.T and Nizamuddin Kochumanappuzha, challenged the inclusion of candidates with engineering degrees and diplomas in the KSEB rank list. The High Court observed that “Engineering degrees/diplomas not presupposing acquisition of NTC, hence not to be considered ‘higher qualification’ for this post.”

This landmark decision arises from the appeal against the dismissal of writ petitions that questioned the eligibility of engineering degree and diploma holders for the said posts. The court highlighted the necessity for clear demarcation of qualifications for specific job roles, stating, “Consideration of degrees and diplomas for positions meant for NTC holders could disadvantageously affect employment opportunities of NTC holders.”

The judgment also addressed the role of executive orders in determining the equivalence of qualifications. The court noted that the Ext.P11 order, declaring diploma courses in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as a higher qualification to NTC, is deemed inapplicable as “Change of qualification criteria post-notification not permissible.”

In its decision, the court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned judgment, and directed to recast the rank list excluding degree or diploma holders in engineering without the NTC as specified in the notification. This ruling underscores the court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of employment qualifications and ensuring fair opportunities for candidates holding specific vocational certifications.

Date of Decision: 17th November 2023

Muhammed Naeem V.T VS State of Kerala

Latest Legal News