At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Kerala High Court Rules Engineering Degrees & Diplomas Not Equivalent to NTC for KSEB Meter Reader Posts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has declared that engineering degrees and diplomas cannot be considered equivalent or higher qualifications to the National Trade Certificate (NTC) in Electrician/Wireman/Electronics trade for the post of Meter Reader/Spot Biller in Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Amit Rawal and C.S. Sudha in the writ appeals No. 370 of 2023 and 398 of 2023 against the judgment in WP(C) No. 3383/2022 dated 7.12.2022 of the High Court of Kerala.

The appellants, Muhammed Naeem V.T and Nizamuddin Kochumanappuzha, challenged the inclusion of candidates with engineering degrees and diplomas in the KSEB rank list. The High Court observed that “Engineering degrees/diplomas not presupposing acquisition of NTC, hence not to be considered ‘higher qualification’ for this post.”

This landmark decision arises from the appeal against the dismissal of writ petitions that questioned the eligibility of engineering degree and diploma holders for the said posts. The court highlighted the necessity for clear demarcation of qualifications for specific job roles, stating, “Consideration of degrees and diplomas for positions meant for NTC holders could disadvantageously affect employment opportunities of NTC holders.”

The judgment also addressed the role of executive orders in determining the equivalence of qualifications. The court noted that the Ext.P11 order, declaring diploma courses in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as a higher qualification to NTC, is deemed inapplicable as “Change of qualification criteria post-notification not permissible.”

In its decision, the court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned judgment, and directed to recast the rank list excluding degree or diploma holders in engineering without the NTC as specified in the notification. This ruling underscores the court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of employment qualifications and ensuring fair opportunities for candidates holding specific vocational certifications.

Date of Decision: 17th November 2023

Muhammed Naeem V.T VS State of Kerala

Latest Legal News