Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Kerala High Court Rules Against Unapproved Mortgage of School Properties, Cites Violation of Education Act*

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has quashed a notice of sale of immovable property (Ext.P6) and declared that the Educational Agency responsible for managing a school had no right to mortgage certain properties without obtaining the required permission under the Kerala Education Act, 1958, and Rules 1959.

 The case, WP(C) No. 7988 of 2020, centered around the unauthorized mortgage of school properties and was brought before the court by Swaroop V., the Manager of PAMM Upper Primary School in Palakkad.

 The court, in its judgment delivered on August 10, 2023, observed that:

  "The 5th respondent who is an Educational Agency, without giving a mandate in Rule 1 of Chapter X and without obtaining permission from the authorities, and Section 6 of the Kerala Education Act, has mortgaged the properties of the School specifically stated as item nos. 2 and 3 in Ext.P6 notice, describing it as residential properties, even though it belongs to the School and lying as a playground."

 This ruling underscores the importance of adherence to the provisions of the Kerala Education Act, 1958, and the Rules 1959, which require prior written permission for any sale, mortgage, lease, pledge, charge, or transfer of possession in respect of properties of aided schools.

 The court further emphasized the legislative intent behind these provisions, stating:

  "The legislative intent behind the ban under Section 6 is the well maintenance and proper conduct of the aided schools, which is absolutely essential in the public interest."

 As a result of this judgment, Ext.P6 was quashed to the extent it related to item nos. 2 and 3, and it was declared that the 5th respondent did not have the right to mortgage the properties without obtaining the necessary permission.

 This verdict serves as a reminder of the legal obligations placed on educational agencies and school managers when dealing with school properties and highlights the need for strict compliance with the law to ensure the proper functioning of aided schools.

Date of Decision:  Thursday, the 10th day of August 2023

SWAROOP V. vs STATE OF KERALA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/kerala-THE-10TH-DAY-OF-AUGUST-2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News