Gratuity Is A Statutory Right, Cannot Be Denied On Vague Allegations Of Abandonment: Calcutta High Court Directs Employer To Pay Pending Gratuity With Interest Prosecutrix Is a Victim of Crime, Not an Accomplice — Sole Testimony Sufficient for Conviction If It Inspires Confidence: Bombay High Court Rape Is An Offence Against Society And Not A Matter To Be Left For Compromise: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash Proceedings Under Section 376 IPC And U.P. Conversion Prevention Act Despite Settlement Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Compartmentalized Horizontal Reservation in Sports Quota for MBBS Admissions Total Non-Compliance of Section 42 Vitiates the Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Acquittal in 25-Year-Old NDPS Case Involving 30 Bags of Poppy Husk An Advocate’s Office Situated in a Commercial Building Qualifies as Non-Residential Use Entitling Eviction under Section 12(1)(f) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to Criminal History—Conspiracy Allegations Alone Insufficient Without Direct Role in SC/ST Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Vested Right to Retain Government Accommodation After Losing Public Office — Penal Rent Justified for Unauthorized Occupation: Patna High Court These Litigations Appear to Be Luxury Litigations: Allahabad High Court Imposes Cost on Over 6400 Petitioners Seeking Revival of TET-Based Selection Process Rule 6(2) Is Not a Cut-Off Provision—Supreme Court Declares Candidates Eligible If D.El.Ed. Was Completed Before Selection Implementation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Cannot Be Halted on the Basis of Belated and Baseless Custody Without Communication of Grounds Is No Custody in Law —Violation of Articles 21 and 22 Nullifies Arrest and Remand: Punjab & Haryana High Court Declares Arrest of Music Producer as Illegal Scribe Is Not a Substitute for Attesting Witness—Will Must Satisfy Section 63 of Succession Act and Section 68 of Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects 45-Year-Old Testamentary Claim Removal From Service With Superannuation Benefits Entitles Employee to Pension: Supreme Court Acknowledgment of Liability Extends Limitation — Pendency of Appeal No Ground to Resist Recovery: Supreme Court Sympathy Cannot Override Binding Conditions of Tender: Supreme Court Sets  Aside High Court’s Direction to Alter Applicant’s Group Classification for BPCL Dealership Land Acquisition | Factory Without CLU Can't Claim Land Release Despite Long Possession; However, Compensation Under 2013 Act Granted : Supreme Court Person’s Identity Is Not Lost If a Machine Fails to Recognize Them: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes LIC’s Rejection Over Biometric Mismatch Mother Cannot Mask Paternity to Satisfy Ego: Bombay High Court Rejects Petition to List Woman as ‘Single Parent’ in Child’s Birth Certificate Transferee Pendente Lite Is Bound by the Decree—Cannot Obstruct Execution Proceedings: Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Revisional Court for Overreach Higher Placement in Seniority List Cannot Be Ignored: Supreme Court Upholds Direction to Consider Contractual Worker for Appointment on Par with Others Regularised CBI Investigation is Not to Be Ordered Routinely on Vague Allegations: Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Order Directing CBI Probe in Extortion Case When Aggressors Trespass Armed into a Dwelling and Cause Fatal Injuries, Exception to Murder Does Not Arise: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction under Section 302 IPC Delayed Payment for 50 Years Warrants Reasonable Interest, But Excessive Rates Cannot Be Granted": Supreme Court

Kerala High Court Rules Against Unapproved Mortgage of School Properties, Cites Violation of Education Act*

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has quashed a notice of sale of immovable property (Ext.P6) and declared that the Educational Agency responsible for managing a school had no right to mortgage certain properties without obtaining the required permission under the Kerala Education Act, 1958, and Rules 1959.

 The case, WP(C) No. 7988 of 2020, centered around the unauthorized mortgage of school properties and was brought before the court by Swaroop V., the Manager of PAMM Upper Primary School in Palakkad.

 The court, in its judgment delivered on August 10, 2023, observed that:

  "The 5th respondent who is an Educational Agency, without giving a mandate in Rule 1 of Chapter X and without obtaining permission from the authorities, and Section 6 of the Kerala Education Act, has mortgaged the properties of the School specifically stated as item nos. 2 and 3 in Ext.P6 notice, describing it as residential properties, even though it belongs to the School and lying as a playground."

 This ruling underscores the importance of adherence to the provisions of the Kerala Education Act, 1958, and the Rules 1959, which require prior written permission for any sale, mortgage, lease, pledge, charge, or transfer of possession in respect of properties of aided schools.

 The court further emphasized the legislative intent behind these provisions, stating:

  "The legislative intent behind the ban under Section 6 is the well maintenance and proper conduct of the aided schools, which is absolutely essential in the public interest."

 As a result of this judgment, Ext.P6 was quashed to the extent it related to item nos. 2 and 3, and it was declared that the 5th respondent did not have the right to mortgage the properties without obtaining the necessary permission.

 This verdict serves as a reminder of the legal obligations placed on educational agencies and school managers when dealing with school properties and highlights the need for strict compliance with the law to ensure the proper functioning of aided schools.

Date of Decision:  Thursday, the 10th day of August 2023

SWAROOP V. vs STATE OF KERALA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/kerala-THE-10TH-DAY-OF-AUGUST-2023.pdf"]

Similar News