State Must Appoint Experienced Contractual Workers Before Opening Vacancies To Outside Candidates; 'Preference' Clause Not A Common Merit Pool: Supreme Court Systematic Denial Of MTP Services & Lack Of Support Persons For Child Rape Victims Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court Contractual Cap On Damages Cannot Be A License For Inordinate Delay; Bombay HC Upholds Award Bypassing 1% Liability Limit SSB Commandant Empowered To Order Salary Deduction For Wife's Maintenance As Disciplinary Measure: Calcutta High Court Agreement To Sell Recording Delivery Of Possession Attracts Stamp Duty As 'Conveyance'; Marking As Exhibit Doesn't Bar Inadmissibility If Objection Is Kept Open: Chhattisgarh HC Court Has No Power To Condone Delay In Filing Written Statement Beyond 120 Days Maximum Limit Prescribed In DHC Original Side Rules: Delhi High Court 'Cleanser' Not A 'Drug' Under Drugs & Cosmetics Act, Prosecution Foundation Cut From Roots: Gujarat High Court Illegal Appointment Does Not Mature Into Legality By Efflux Of Time; Salary From Public Exchequer Only For Demonstrably Legal Appointments: Allahabad High Court Oral Statements Cannot Modify Terms Of Written Agreement; Suit For Recovery Post-Lease Expiry Barred By Limitation: Karnataka High Court Registered Adoption Deed Creates Only Rebuttable Presumption; Independent Proof Of 'Giving & Taking' Ceremonies Mandatory: Madras High Court Stay On Bank's 'Fraud' Classification Doesn't Bar CBI From Conducting Search In Related Criminal Case: Telangana High Court Magistrate Not Functus Officio After Ordering 156(3) CrPC Probe; Must Actively Monitor Investigation Progress: Rajasthan High Court Power Under Section 319 CrPC Extraordinary, Cannot Be Exercised On Basis Of Section 164 Statements Or Hearsay: Patna High Court Appellate Authority Under Executive Policy Is 'Persona Designata', Cannot Invoke Limitation Act To Condone Delay: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Kerala High Court Rejects Bail in ₹6.14 Crore Tax Evasion Case, Citing Seriousness of Allegations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Kerala High Court has denied bail to a petitioner accused of tax evasion amounting to ₹6.14 crores under the Kerala State Goods and Service Act, 2017. The judgment, delivered by Justice Mohammed Nias C.P., has underscored the gravity of the allegations and the importance of continuing the investigation without interference.

The court’s decision was based on a thorough analysis of the case. The petitioner, a wholesale distributor of mobile accessories and electronic items, was alleged to have supplied goods without issuing invoices, thereby evading tax payments dating back to 2018. The arrest followed a raid on the petitioner’s office on November 9, 2023.

One of the key legal points addressed by the court was the timing of the arrest in relation to the assessment proceedings. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the arrest could only occur after the completion of the assessment. However, the court rejected this argument, stating, “The power to arrest under Section 69 can be invoked if the Commissioner has a reason to believe that the person has committed offences that are prescribed and which are punishable under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017.”

The court further emphasized the need to prevent potential tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, stating, “If it is to ensure a proper investigation and prevent the possibility of tampering with evidence or intimidating or influencing the witnesses, the power can certainly be exercised.”

Ultimately, the court found that the allegations of tax evasion, amounting to more than ₹6.5 crores, were serious and warranted a thorough investigation. Therefore, it denied bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Date of Decision: 12th December 2023

BADHA RAM VS INTELLIGENCE OFFICER 

 

Latest Legal News