Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to Head Priest Selection at Sabarimala Temple

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court today dismissed a writ petition challenging the selection of the Melsanthi (Head Priest) for the Sabarimala Sree Dharma Sastha Temple for the year 1199 ME (2023-24). The petition was dismissed by a bench comprising Honorable Mr. Justice Anil K. Narendran and Honorable Mr. Justice G. Girish.

The petitioner, Madhusoodanan Namboothiri, had raised allegations against the selection process, specifically questioning the manner in which the lots were drawn. In their judgment, the Court noted, “Having considered the pleadings and materials on record, the submissions made at the Bar and perusing the video clipping and CCTV footage referred to above, we find no reason to interfere with the selection of the 5th respondent as Melsanthi.”

The Court’s decision was influenced by detailed observations of CCTV footage and news items from ‘Asianet News’ concerning the draw of lots, conducted on October 18, 2023. The footage was scrutinized to ascertain any procedural improprieties. However, the Court found no substantial evidence against the 5th respondent, thereby reinforcing the validity of the selection process.

The selection procedure, a traditional draw of lots, was central to the petitioner’s allegations. The Court acknowledged these concerns but ultimately found them unsubstantiated. The judgment emphasized, “Insofar as the aforesaid contention raised by the petitioner is concerned...it was only a coincidence that occurred at the time of the draw of lots on 18.10.2023.”

This ruling is significant, especially considering the revered status of the Melsanthi in the Sabarimala Temple, a major pilgrimage site. The Court’s decision upholds the sanctity and fairness of the traditional selection process, providing reassurance to devotees and stakeholders.

The judgment also referred to the Krishnan Namboothiri S. V. Travancore Devaswom Board case, delineating the unique nature of the selection process for religious positions, which do not strictly fall under the purview of public employment norms.

Advocates representing the petitioner and the respondents, including the State of Kerala and the Travancore Devaswom Board, were present during the proceedings. The judgment also issued specific directions regarding the entry of persons to the ‘Sopanam enclosure’ during the selection process, aiming to ensure transparency and order in future selections.

High Court’s ruling marks a significant affirmation of traditional religious practices and the integrity of the selection process for one of Kerala’s most esteemed religious roles.

Date of Decision: November 9, 2023

MADHUSOODANAN NAMBOOTHIRI  VS STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News