High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in Assault Case Against Doctor, Stresses Need for Custodial Interrogation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On May 28, 2024, the Kerala High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application and writ petition filed by Dr. Haritha H.S. regarding the alleged assault and molestation by Joseph Chacko. The bench, presided by Justice A. Badharudeen, stressed the necessity of custodial interrogation for a thorough investigation, given the severity of the allegations and the supporting evidence.

The High Court underscored the importance of custodial interrogation in this case to ensure a thorough and unbiased investigation. “In a case involving serious allegations, grant of anticipatory bail would impede the investigation,” Justice Badharudeen remarked. The court noted that the accused’s arrest is crucial for effectively collecting and corroborating evidence, as the case involves significant accusations of assault and molestation.

Justice Badharudeen meticulously reviewed the evidence, including the First Information Statement (FIS) and the case diary. The court found the allegations made by Dr. Haritha credible, supported by prima facie evidence. “The prosecution case is well made out, prima facie, and the Investigating Officer also wanted to arrest the accused for effectively investigating the case,” the judgment stated. The court also took into account the trend of increasing violence against healthcare professionals, reinforcing the need for stringent action.

The court discussed the principles of judicial scrutiny, emphasizing the necessity for a meticulous and unbiased investigation. The judgment reiterated that custodial interrogation is essential in cases with severe allegations to prevent any influence or tampering with evidence by the accused. “Entrustment of the investigation to another officer is not warranted at this stage as the present investigation is progressing satisfactorily,” Justice Badharudeen observed.

Justice Badharudeen highlighted the significance of the Kerala Healthcare Service Persons and Healthcare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Amendment Act, 2023. The amendment, which makes offenses against healthcare professionals non-bailable, underscores the legislature’s intent to provide robust protection to medical personnel. “The incorporation of non-bailable penal provisions is a legislative response to the increasing assaults on healthcare workers,” the judgment noted.

Justice Badharudeen remarked, “In a case involving serious allegations, grant of anticipatory bail would impede the investigation. The necessity for arrest and custodial interrogation is underscored by the prima facie evidence supporting the allegations.”

The Kerala High Court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail and dismiss the writ petition for investigation transfer sends a strong message about the judiciary’s commitment to protecting healthcare professionals and ensuring thorough investigations in cases of assault. This judgment reinforces the legal framework for addressing violence against medical personnel and underscores the critical role of judicial scrutiny in upholding justice.

Date of Decision: May 28, 2024

Dr. Haritha H.S. vs. State Police Chief & Others

 

Similar News