MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in Assault Case, Affirms Ongoing Investigation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Kerala High Court denied anticipatory bail to the accused in a high-profile assault case involving a doctor at an Ayurvedic clinic. The court also dismissed a writ petition seeking to transfer the investigation to a higher-ranked police officer, affirming the adequacy of the ongoing investigation conducted by the current officer. The decision underscores the need for thorough custodial interrogation in serious allegations of violence against healthcare professionals.

Justice A. Badharudeen emphasized the necessity of custodial interrogation to ensure a comprehensive investigation. "Grant of anticipatory bail would impede the investigation, especially in cases involving serious allegations," the judgment noted. The court highlighted that despite the accused's cooperation with the police, the severity of the accusations required his arrest to uncover the complete truth.

The court expressed concern over the increasing trend of violence against doctors and healthcare staff. "The specific allegations and the Investigating Officer’s findings prima facie indicate a well-founded prosecution case," Justice Badharudeen observed. The judgment referenced recent legislative amendments aimed at curbing such violence, reinforcing the non-bailable nature of the alleged offenses under the Kerala Healthcare Service Persons and Healthcare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Amendment Act, 2023.

The court elaborated on the legal principles guiding the dismissal of the anticipatory bail plea and the writ petition. It reiterated that the current investigation showed no signs of bias or inadequacy, despite the accused’s multiple bail applications potentially stalling the arrest. "The materials produced before this Court indicate a fair and unbiased ongoing investigation," Justice Badharudeen stated.

Justice Badharudeen remarked, "Even after the introduction of non-bailable penal provisions, the attack against doctors and hospital staff has not seen a reduction. The present case is a typical example, and effective investigation necessitates the arrest of the accused."

The Kerala High Court's ruling highlights the judiciary's commitment to protecting healthcare professionals and ensuring justice in cases of violence against them. By denying anticipatory bail and affirming the ongoing investigation, the court reinforces the importance of custodial interrogation in serious criminal cases. This decision is expected to deter further incidents of violence against medical practitioners and strengthen the legal framework supporting their safety and security.

Date of Decision: 28-05-2024

Dr. Haritha H.S and Others vs. The State Police Chief and Others

 

Latest Legal News