Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Kerala High Court Allows Government to Reclaim Land from Trivandrum Tennis Club Over ₹31 Crore in Lease Arrears

13 October 2024 12:33 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Kerala High Court dismissed a petition by the Trivandrum Tennis Club seeking renewal of its FL4A foreign liquor license and challenging the government’s claim for over ₹31 crore in unpaid lease arrears. The court upheld the government's decision to deny the license and reclaim the land, citing the club’s failure to comply with the 1995 Land Assignment Rules.

"Failure to Pay Lease Arrears of ₹31 Crore Makes Club Liable for Land Reclamation": Kerala HC Rules Against Trivandrum Tennis Club

The Trivandrum Tennis Club had contested the applicability of the 1995 Land Assignment Rules, arguing that its historical lease agreements exempted it from paying arrears. However, the court ruled that the club was bound by the updated rules and had failed to comply with the conditions for lease renewal, making the government's actions legal.

The Trivandrum Tennis Club, established in 1937, had been operating on land leased from the government since 1950. The lease was renewed in 1975 for 50 years, with the current term expiring in 2025. The club also held a foreign liquor license, which was periodically renewed. However, after the enactment of the 1995 Assignment of Land Rules, the club was required to renew its lease under the new rules and clear significant arrears, which it failed to do.

The government claimed arrears totaling ₹31.2 crore for the period 1995-2023. The club challenged this demand and sought the renewal of its FL4A license, leading to the current legal proceedings.

The court considered whether the club was bound by the 1995 Rules regarding lease renewal and payment of arrears, and whether the government was justified in refusing to renew the liquor license.

The court held that the 1995 Rules applied to the club, and despite the club’s application for renewal in 1998, it had failed to pay the arrears. The club could not claim immunity from the rules or arrears.

The court emphasized that the club's failure to act in accordance with the rules and its long-standing arrears disqualified it from seeking renewal of the liquor license or continuing to occupy the leased land.

The court dismissed the club’s petition, stating that the refusal to renew the FL4A license was valid due to the unpaid arrears. The court authorized the government to reclaim the land leased to the club and recover the dues.

"The petitioner has no legal basis to challenge the applicability of the 1995 Rules after defaulting on lease payments for nearly three decades."

The Kerala High Court’s ruling underscores the government's authority to enforce lease agreements and recover arrears, reaffirming that leaseholders must comply with updated laws and regulations. The decision sets a precedent for enforcing compliance with land lease rules across the state.

 

Date of Decision: October 9, 2024

Trivandrum Tennis Club vs. State of Kerala

Latest Legal News