MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Kerala High Court Allows Government to Reclaim Land from Trivandrum Tennis Club Over ₹31 Crore in Lease Arrears

13 October 2024 12:33 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Kerala High Court dismissed a petition by the Trivandrum Tennis Club seeking renewal of its FL4A foreign liquor license and challenging the government’s claim for over ₹31 crore in unpaid lease arrears. The court upheld the government's decision to deny the license and reclaim the land, citing the club’s failure to comply with the 1995 Land Assignment Rules.

"Failure to Pay Lease Arrears of ₹31 Crore Makes Club Liable for Land Reclamation": Kerala HC Rules Against Trivandrum Tennis Club

The Trivandrum Tennis Club had contested the applicability of the 1995 Land Assignment Rules, arguing that its historical lease agreements exempted it from paying arrears. However, the court ruled that the club was bound by the updated rules and had failed to comply with the conditions for lease renewal, making the government's actions legal.

The Trivandrum Tennis Club, established in 1937, had been operating on land leased from the government since 1950. The lease was renewed in 1975 for 50 years, with the current term expiring in 2025. The club also held a foreign liquor license, which was periodically renewed. However, after the enactment of the 1995 Assignment of Land Rules, the club was required to renew its lease under the new rules and clear significant arrears, which it failed to do.

The government claimed arrears totaling ₹31.2 crore for the period 1995-2023. The club challenged this demand and sought the renewal of its FL4A license, leading to the current legal proceedings.

The court considered whether the club was bound by the 1995 Rules regarding lease renewal and payment of arrears, and whether the government was justified in refusing to renew the liquor license.

The court held that the 1995 Rules applied to the club, and despite the club’s application for renewal in 1998, it had failed to pay the arrears. The club could not claim immunity from the rules or arrears.

The court emphasized that the club's failure to act in accordance with the rules and its long-standing arrears disqualified it from seeking renewal of the liquor license or continuing to occupy the leased land.

The court dismissed the club’s petition, stating that the refusal to renew the FL4A license was valid due to the unpaid arrears. The court authorized the government to reclaim the land leased to the club and recover the dues.

"The petitioner has no legal basis to challenge the applicability of the 1995 Rules after defaulting on lease payments for nearly three decades."

The Kerala High Court’s ruling underscores the government's authority to enforce lease agreements and recover arrears, reaffirming that leaseholders must comply with updated laws and regulations. The decision sets a precedent for enforcing compliance with land lease rules across the state.

 

Date of Decision: October 9, 2024

Trivandrum Tennis Club vs. State of Kerala

Latest Legal News