Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

"Karnataka High Court Upholds Homemaker's Right to Maintenance, Recognizes Childcare as Full-Time Responsibility"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Karnataka High Court has underscored the significance of a homemaker's role in raising children, affirming that "taking care of children is a full-time job." The court granted a monthly maintenance of ₹36,000 to a mother, who had quit her job to take care of her children.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, allowed the writ petition filed by Smt. Shylaja S. R and others against Sri Hareesha A, modifying a previous order by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal. The earlier order had granted only half of the claimed maintenance amount.

In the judgment (Writ Petition No. 14094 of 2023), the court highlighted the mother's sacrifices, noting, "It is not in dispute that on the birth of the first child, the wife was asked to leave the job of a Teacher to take care of the child." The court emphasized the importance of a mother's role, saying, "The wife, as a homemaker and mother, works indefatigably round the clock."

The case revolved around the claim of interim maintenance by the petitioner, who had sought financial support for herself and her two children following the deterioration of her marriage. Her husband, a manager in Canara Bank with a salary close to ₹90,000, opposed the claim, suggesting that his wife, being qualified, should work and earn rather than depend on maintenance.

Rejecting this contention, the court observed, "The respondent being the husband, cannot be seen to contend that the wife is lazing around and not earning money to take care of the children." Justice Nagaprasanna cited various precedents, including the Apex Court's judgments, to emphasize that maintenance must enable the wife and children to continue living as they did before the marital discord.

This decision is seen as a significant acknowledgment of the non-economic contributions of homemakers in a marriage and their entitlement to financial support in cases of marital discord. The judgment serves as a reminder of the legal system's recognition of the intrinsic value of homemaking and childcare, roles often undervalued in monetary terms.

Date of Decision: 28-02-2024

SMT. SHYLAJA S. R AND OTHERS Vs. SRI HAREESHA A

 

Latest Legal News