Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Custodial Interrogation Is Not Punitive — Arrest Cannot Be Used as a Tool to Humiliate in Corporate Offence Allegations: Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reasonable Grounds Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Cannot Be Equated with Proof; They Must Reflect More Than Suspicion, But Less Than Conviction: J&K HC Apprehension to Life Is a Just Ground for Transfer When Roots Lie in History of Ideological Violence: Bombay High Court Transfers Defamation Suits Against Hamid Dabholkar, Nikhil Wagle From Goa to Maharashtra

Justice Reconsidered: Orissa High Court Rules 'Heat of Passion' Mitigates Murder to Culpable Homicide

05 September 2024 6:09 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgement on November 2, 2023, the High Court of Orissa delivered a verdict that has become a focal point of legal discussions. The appellant, Leven Kerketta, who was previously convicted under Section 302 of the IPC for the murder of the deceased, saw his conviction altered by the High Court. The bench comprising the Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.K. Sahoo and Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash found merit in the argument of ‘grave and sudden provocation,’ leading to a significant change in the appellant’s sentence.

The court observed, “The possibility of raising protest by the appellant to the conduct of his wife (P.W.1) and the deceased and also raising sudden quarrel cannot be ruled out.” This observation came in light of the defense’s argument that the appellant had been provoked upon seeing his wife in the company of the deceased under compromising circumstances.

The Hon’ble judges further noted, “The objective test is whether a reasonable man is likely to lose his self-control as a result of such provocation.” Based on this rationale, the court held that the appellant’s actions fell under Exception 4 to Section 300 of the IPC, leading to the modification of his conviction to Section 304 Part-II, which denotes culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

In delivering their decision, the bench also took into account the time that Kerketta had already spent in custody. They stated, “As the appellant has remained in jail custody for more than five years at different times in connection with this case and in the meantime, more than twenty-two years have already been passed since the date of occurrence and the appellant is more than sixty years of age...” This led to the reduction of his sentence to the period already undergone.

The court’s decision underscores the significance of the circumstances under which a crime is committed and opens up a dialogue on the interpretation of provocation in the eyes of the law. The case, represented by Mr. Laxmi Narayan Patel for the appellant and Mr. Sonak Mishra for the state, has thus concluded with a judgement that emphasizes the human element in legal proceedings, acknowledging the complex interplay of emotions and actions.

Date of Decision: 02.11.2023

Leven Kerketta VS State of Odisha         

Latest Legal News