Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Justice Prevails for Train Accident Victim’s Widow: High Court Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by Justice Dharmesh Sharma, has set a precedent in the case of train accident compensation. The Court has overturned the previous decision by the Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT) and awarded a compensation of Rs. 8 lakhs to Rukmani, the widow of the deceased Moti Chand, who tragically lost his life in a train accident.

The judgment, pronounced on November 17, 2023, comes after a careful consideration of the case, where the appellant’s plea was previously dismissed by the RCT. Justice Sharma, in his ruling, emphasized the importance of credible witness testimony and the analysis of post-mortem reports in such cases. He noted, “The nature of injuries were commensurating from accidental fall from a train,” highlighting the consistency of the injuries with the alleged accident.

The case revolved around the death of Moti Chand, who was involved in a train accident on October 19, 2016. The RCT had initially dismissed the compensation claim on grounds of insufficient evidence proving that Chand was a bona fide passenger. However, the High Court, upon reevaluation of the witness’s testimony and the post-mortem report, found substantial evidence supporting the claim that the deceased was indeed a bona fide passenger and had met with an ‘untoward incident’, as defined under the Railways Act.

Justice Sharma’s ruling further stated, “It is probable that the rail ticket might have fallen out of the pockets probably on account of the impact of jerks due to the momentum of the body on its fall on the rail tracks.” This observation was crucial in understanding the circumstances of the accident and the absence of a ticket on the deceased’s body.

The compensation includees an interest of 9% per annum from the date of the incident until the date of the judgment. Additionally, the RCT has been directed to deposit the compensation amount within four weeks. In case of failure, the appellant is entitled to an interest on the claim amount from the date of this judgment till realization.

Date of Decision: 17 November 2023

RUKMANI  VS UNION OF INDIA 

Latest Legal News