A Will That Silences Legal Heirs Without Cause Cannot Speak the Truth of the Testator’s Intent: Orissa High Court Rejects Solemnity of Registered Will Conviction Can Be Set Aside Even in Non-Compoundable Offences If Parties Settle: Punjab & Haryana High Court Affirms Inherent Power under Section 482 CrPC Mere Absence of Ticket or Station Report Not Fatal to Claim: Bombay High Court Says Railway Claims Can Be Proved by Circumstantial Evidence Judgment of Acquittal Cannot Be Reversed Merely Because A Different View Is Possible, Unless It’s Perverse Or Ignores Material Evidence: Himachal High Court Courts Cannot Reopen Admissions Once Deadline Expires: Orissa High Court Rejects SEBC Nursing Aspirants' Plea Filed Post Cut-Off A Sketchy Allegation of Corrupt Practice Can’t Be Cured Later Through Amendment: Bombay High Court Rejects Election Petition Against Shiv Sena MLA Delay in FIR, If Plausibly Explained, Cannot Vitiate Claim: Madras High Court Enhances Compensation to ₹3.26 Crores for Fatal Accident Involving Pillion Rider Failure to Videograph Search Violates BNSS: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, Slams Police for Ignoring Procedural Mandates No Customs Duty Without Clear Authority Of Law: Supreme Court Quashes Levy On SEZ Electricity Supplied To Domestic Tariff Area Owner's Admission Cannot Be Brushed Aside to Deny Compensation: Supreme Court Reinstates ₹3.7 Lakh Award to Family of Deceased Driver Benefit Of Doubt Must Prevail Where Eyewitness Testimony Is Infirm And Contradict Medical Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Double-Murder Convict A Mere Error in Bail Orders Cannot Tarnish a Judge’s Career: Supreme Court Quashes Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail under Excise Act Order 1 Rule 10 CPC | A Necessary Party is One Without Whom No Order Can Be Made Effectively: Supreme Court Readiness and Willingness Must Be Proven—Mere Pleading Is Not Enough For Specific Performance: Supreme Court Returning Expired Stamp Papers Is No Refund in Law: Supreme Court Directs State to Pay ₹3.99 Lakhs Despite Limitation under UP Stamp Rules Supreme Court Distinguishes ‘Masterminds’ from ‘Facilitators’: Bail Denied to Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam, Granted to Gulfisha Fatima & Others: Supreme Court Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Section 41 Does Not Extinguish Arbitration Clause in Leave and License Agreements: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Unilateral Appointment Void Ab Initio; Participation in Proceedings Does Not Constitute Waiver: Supreme Court Section 21 Arbitration Act Is Not a Gatekeeper of Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ₹2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Kerala Government

justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done: P&H High Court Sets Aside Vague RTI Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana has set aside an order by the State Information Commission, Haryana, in the case of Darbara Singh versus The State Information Commission, Haryana and others. The Court emphasized the critical need for quasi-judicial authorities to provide "reasoned decisions" in the process of adjudicating Right to Information (RTI) appeals.

Justice Vikas Bahl, presiding over the case, underscored the importance of transparency and detailed reasoning in judicial and quasi-judicial decision-making. "The insistence on recording of reasons is meant to serve the wider principle of justice that justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done," Justice Bahl remarked, highlighting the principles ensuring justice is both done and visibly seen to be done. This observation underscores the Court’s dedication to upholding judicial standards and fostering public trust in the legal system.

The petitioner, Darbara Singh, had initially sought information on 7 specific points via an RTI application. Following incomplete responses, Singh escalated the matter through the statutory appeal process, ultimately leading to this High Court intervention. The Court found the State Information Commission's order disposing of Singh's second appeal to be cryptic and non-speaking, thereby violating established legal principles for transparency and accountability in information dissemination.

The High Court's decision has not only provided relief to the petitioner but also set a significant precedent for future cases involving the RTI Act. The judgment mandates first and second appellate authorities under the RTI Act to issue detailed and reasoned decisions. The Court's directive is expected to enhance the quality of decision-making in RTI related cases, ensuring that authorities adhere to legal standards for reason and transparency.

This judgment is seen as a significant step towards strengthening the framework of the Right to Information Act, reinforcing the notion that access to information is a cornerstone of democracy. The High Court's emphasis on detailed, reasoned orders is expected to guide the functioning of information commissions across the country, leading to more robust and transparent decision-making processes.

Date of Decision: 14.12.2023

Darbara Singh VS The State Information Commission

 

Latest Legal News