Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done: P&H High Court Sets Aside Vague RTI Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana has set aside an order by the State Information Commission, Haryana, in the case of Darbara Singh versus The State Information Commission, Haryana and others. The Court emphasized the critical need for quasi-judicial authorities to provide "reasoned decisions" in the process of adjudicating Right to Information (RTI) appeals.

Justice Vikas Bahl, presiding over the case, underscored the importance of transparency and detailed reasoning in judicial and quasi-judicial decision-making. "The insistence on recording of reasons is meant to serve the wider principle of justice that justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done," Justice Bahl remarked, highlighting the principles ensuring justice is both done and visibly seen to be done. This observation underscores the Court’s dedication to upholding judicial standards and fostering public trust in the legal system.

The petitioner, Darbara Singh, had initially sought information on 7 specific points via an RTI application. Following incomplete responses, Singh escalated the matter through the statutory appeal process, ultimately leading to this High Court intervention. The Court found the State Information Commission's order disposing of Singh's second appeal to be cryptic and non-speaking, thereby violating established legal principles for transparency and accountability in information dissemination.

The High Court's decision has not only provided relief to the petitioner but also set a significant precedent for future cases involving the RTI Act. The judgment mandates first and second appellate authorities under the RTI Act to issue detailed and reasoned decisions. The Court's directive is expected to enhance the quality of decision-making in RTI related cases, ensuring that authorities adhere to legal standards for reason and transparency.

This judgment is seen as a significant step towards strengthening the framework of the Right to Information Act, reinforcing the notion that access to information is a cornerstone of democracy. The High Court's emphasis on detailed, reasoned orders is expected to guide the functioning of information commissions across the country, leading to more robust and transparent decision-making processes.

Date of Decision: 14.12.2023

Darbara Singh VS The State Information Commission

 

Latest Legal News