Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done: P&H High Court Sets Aside Vague RTI Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana has set aside an order by the State Information Commission, Haryana, in the case of Darbara Singh versus The State Information Commission, Haryana and others. The Court emphasized the critical need for quasi-judicial authorities to provide "reasoned decisions" in the process of adjudicating Right to Information (RTI) appeals.

Justice Vikas Bahl, presiding over the case, underscored the importance of transparency and detailed reasoning in judicial and quasi-judicial decision-making. "The insistence on recording of reasons is meant to serve the wider principle of justice that justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done," Justice Bahl remarked, highlighting the principles ensuring justice is both done and visibly seen to be done. This observation underscores the Court’s dedication to upholding judicial standards and fostering public trust in the legal system.

The petitioner, Darbara Singh, had initially sought information on 7 specific points via an RTI application. Following incomplete responses, Singh escalated the matter through the statutory appeal process, ultimately leading to this High Court intervention. The Court found the State Information Commission's order disposing of Singh's second appeal to be cryptic and non-speaking, thereby violating established legal principles for transparency and accountability in information dissemination.

The High Court's decision has not only provided relief to the petitioner but also set a significant precedent for future cases involving the RTI Act. The judgment mandates first and second appellate authorities under the RTI Act to issue detailed and reasoned decisions. The Court's directive is expected to enhance the quality of decision-making in RTI related cases, ensuring that authorities adhere to legal standards for reason and transparency.

This judgment is seen as a significant step towards strengthening the framework of the Right to Information Act, reinforcing the notion that access to information is a cornerstone of democracy. The High Court's emphasis on detailed, reasoned orders is expected to guide the functioning of information commissions across the country, leading to more robust and transparent decision-making processes.

Date of Decision: 14.12.2023

Darbara Singh VS The State Information Commission

 

Latest Legal News