Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary

Jurisdiction in Cases of Continued Mental Cruelty at Parental Home Affirmed: MP High Court Transfers Dowry Case to Jabalpur Citing Mental Trauma Persists

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, in a significant judgment, addressed the critical issue of jurisdiction in cases involving continued mental cruelty at the parental home of the victim. Justice Raj Mohan Singh, while adjudicating a petition for transferring a dowry-related case, held that the jurisdiction lies with the court where mental trauma and psychological distress continue, applying Section 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Smt. Jahnvi Tripathi filed a writ petition for transferring the investigation and trial of her FIR, alleging dowry demands, physical abuse, and mental cruelty by her husband and in-laws, from Bhopal to Jabalpur. The petitioner argued that although physical abuse occurred in Bengaluru and Bhopal, the mental cruelty continued at her parental home in Jabalpur.

Justice Raj Mohan Singh observed, "Mental cruelty borne out of physical cruelty or abusive and humiliating verbal exchanges would continue in the parental home even though there may not be any overt act of physical cruelty at such place." Citing the Supreme Court judgments in 'Ruhi Vs. Anees Ahmed' and 'Rupali Devi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh', the Court affirmed that the effects of mental cruelty in the parental home are a continuation of the offence under Section 498-A IPC, thus falling under the jurisdiction of the place where such consequences ensue.

The Court further rejected the objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, stating that at the time of its filing, no alternative remedy under Section 407 Cr.P.C. was available, and the unilateral transfer of investigation by the Bhopal police was without jurisdiction.

Decision: The Court accepted the writ petition, holding the transfer of investigation from Jabalpur to Bhopal as illegal and directing the trial to be conducted in Jabalpur, considering the continued mental trauma experienced by the petitioner at her parental home.

Date of Decision: 5th March 2024.

Smt. Jahnvi Tripathi (Dubey) vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Others,

Similar News