Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Jurisdiction in Cases of Continued Mental Cruelty at Parental Home Affirmed: MP High Court Transfers Dowry Case to Jabalpur Citing Mental Trauma Persists

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, in a significant judgment, addressed the critical issue of jurisdiction in cases involving continued mental cruelty at the parental home of the victim. Justice Raj Mohan Singh, while adjudicating a petition for transferring a dowry-related case, held that the jurisdiction lies with the court where mental trauma and psychological distress continue, applying Section 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Smt. Jahnvi Tripathi filed a writ petition for transferring the investigation and trial of her FIR, alleging dowry demands, physical abuse, and mental cruelty by her husband and in-laws, from Bhopal to Jabalpur. The petitioner argued that although physical abuse occurred in Bengaluru and Bhopal, the mental cruelty continued at her parental home in Jabalpur.

Justice Raj Mohan Singh observed, "Mental cruelty borne out of physical cruelty or abusive and humiliating verbal exchanges would continue in the parental home even though there may not be any overt act of physical cruelty at such place." Citing the Supreme Court judgments in 'Ruhi Vs. Anees Ahmed' and 'Rupali Devi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh', the Court affirmed that the effects of mental cruelty in the parental home are a continuation of the offence under Section 498-A IPC, thus falling under the jurisdiction of the place where such consequences ensue.

The Court further rejected the objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, stating that at the time of its filing, no alternative remedy under Section 407 Cr.P.C. was available, and the unilateral transfer of investigation by the Bhopal police was without jurisdiction.

Decision: The Court accepted the writ petition, holding the transfer of investigation from Jabalpur to Bhopal as illegal and directing the trial to be conducted in Jabalpur, considering the continued mental trauma experienced by the petitioner at her parental home.

Date of Decision: 5th March 2024.

Smt. Jahnvi Tripathi (Dubey) vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Others,

Similar News