Jharkhand High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officials in Case of Missing Jewelry From Locker

In a significant ruling, the High Court of Jharkhand, presided over by Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, has quashed all criminal proceedings against the officials of the Punjab National Bank, Main Road Branch, Ranchi, in a case involving jewelry missing from a bank locker.

The case, drawing attention due to its intricate legal nuances, saw the petitioners accused of theft under Sections 380, 409, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. However, in a detailed judgment, Justice Dwivedi observed, "There is no doubt if the criminality is made out, the criminal and civil both cases can go on simultaneously, however, the criminality is not made out." This observation underscored the court's rationale for quashing the proceedings.

In the judgment, Justice Dwivedi meticulously dissected the responsibilities and limitations of bank locker custodianship, clarifying the legal position regarding the bank's liability in such cases. The court highlighted, "Whatever property is deposited in the locker is undoubtedly in the custody and possession of the Bank... hiring of a locker is a transaction to be distinct in nature from a transaction that would create the relationship of landlord and tenant."

The decision to quash the criminal proceedings was based on the absence of substantial evidence implicating the bank officials. The court referred to the principles laid down in various Supreme Court judgments, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion in quashing proceedings where prima facie evidence is lacking.

This ruling is seen as a significant development in the legal discourse surrounding the security and operation of bank lockers. While the criminal proceedings have been quashed, the court has made it clear that the ongoing civil suit regarding the same incident shall continue unaffected by this order.

Date of Decision: 10.11.2023

Mahesh Minz   vs  The State of Jharkhand. etc