MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

It Would Amount to Dereliction of Duty: Jharkhand High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Case of Brutal Assault on Petitioner

05 September 2024 5:24 AM

By: Admin


In a critical judgment that reiterates the importance of registering FIRs in cases involving cognizable offences, the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has mandated the immediate filing of an FIR in the case of Pooja Giri, who suffered brutal assault by police authorities.

Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, hearing the case, observed, “It is impermissible and it would also amount to dereliction of duty, upon the police officer who has not complied with the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

The case revolved around the petitioner Pooja Giri, who had filed for an FIR to be registered regarding a brutal assault by In-charge of Sadar Police Station, Niranjan Tiwari. Despite clear evidence and a medical report confirming eight different injuries on the petitioner’s body, the police had failed to register an FIR.

Advocate Suraj Singh, representing the petitioner, argued that this was a violation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, which mandates the registration of FIRs for cognizable offences.

The state counsel, Mr. P.C. Sinha, argued that the petitioner had alternative remedies available and that an FIR for the murder of the petitioner’s brother was already under investigation.

Rejecting the state’s arguments, the judge cited, “This is unfortunate that a citizen has been compelled to move before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for registration of the FIR.”

The Court directed the Director General of Police, State of Jharkhand, and the Superintendent of Police, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, to register an FIR forthwith. It also instructed that Circular/SOP be issued to all Station House Officers to scrupulously follow the guidelines set in Lalita Kumari’s case.

The judgment serves as a timely reminder for police authorities to adhere strictly to the law, and it underscores the significance of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law.

Date of Decision: 07/15.09.2023

Pooja Giri  vs The State of Jharkhand

Latest Legal News