Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

It Would Amount to Dereliction of Duty: Jharkhand High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Case of Brutal Assault on Petitioner

05 September 2024 5:24 AM

By: Admin


In a critical judgment that reiterates the importance of registering FIRs in cases involving cognizable offences, the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has mandated the immediate filing of an FIR in the case of Pooja Giri, who suffered brutal assault by police authorities.

Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, hearing the case, observed, “It is impermissible and it would also amount to dereliction of duty, upon the police officer who has not complied with the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

The case revolved around the petitioner Pooja Giri, who had filed for an FIR to be registered regarding a brutal assault by In-charge of Sadar Police Station, Niranjan Tiwari. Despite clear evidence and a medical report confirming eight different injuries on the petitioner’s body, the police had failed to register an FIR.

Advocate Suraj Singh, representing the petitioner, argued that this was a violation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s ruling in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, which mandates the registration of FIRs for cognizable offences.

The state counsel, Mr. P.C. Sinha, argued that the petitioner had alternative remedies available and that an FIR for the murder of the petitioner’s brother was already under investigation.

Rejecting the state’s arguments, the judge cited, “This is unfortunate that a citizen has been compelled to move before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for registration of the FIR.”

The Court directed the Director General of Police, State of Jharkhand, and the Superintendent of Police, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, to register an FIR forthwith. It also instructed that Circular/SOP be issued to all Station House Officers to scrupulously follow the guidelines set in Lalita Kumari’s case.

The judgment serves as a timely reminder for police authorities to adhere strictly to the law, and it underscores the significance of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law.

Date of Decision: 07/15.09.2023

Pooja Giri  vs The State of Jharkhand

Similar News