Public Property Cannot Be Managed Privately for Decades — Fair Price Shops in Hospitals Must Be Allotted by Auction: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Registered Sale Deed Alone Does Not Dismantle Prior Security Interest: Gauhati High Court Rejects Buyer’s Writ Against SARFAESI Action, Cites Expanded Statutory Definition Old OBC Certificates Won’t Work — Supreme Court Says Cut-Off Date Is Final in Rajasthan Civil Judge Exams Power of Attorney Is Not a Licence to Defraud: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Reversal of Sham Sale Deeds by GPA Holder Acting Against NRI Principal’s Interests Not Every Advocate Commissioner Appointment Is Evidence Gathering: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Trial Court’s Discretion in Title Dispute No Invalidation Can Be Attached to One-Year LLM for Public Appointments: Madras High Court Orders Retrospective Appointment of Top-Ranked Candidate Section 63 of the Copyright Act | Publisher Can't Be Prosecuted for Author’s Plagiarism Without Proof of Knowledge: Kerala High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Mathrubhumi Directors Old Marital Disputes Aren’t Enough to Prove Suicide Was Instigated: Supreme Court Acquits Man Jailed for Wife’s Death by Fire Dependent Heir Can Remain in Tenanted Premises Only for Five Years from Tenant’s Death Under WB Tenancy Act: Supreme Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Employment Contract Binding Even in Termination Disputes: Supreme Court Entrustment Was to Run the Business, Not Occupy the Premises: Supreme Court Denies Deemed Tenancy Under Bombay Rent Act Preliminary Enquiry in Corruption Cases Is Desirable, Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Set Aside Quashing of FIR

It is of No Use to Keep Such Seized Vehicles at the Police Stations for a Long Period: Gujarat High Court Grants Release of Seized Vehicle on Surety

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement dated February 15, 2024, the Gujarat High Court, presided over by Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar, addressed the issue of long-term seizure of vehicles by police authorities. The Court allowed the petition for the release of a vehicle, specifically an Eicher Pro CNG Vehicle, which had been seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

The judgement revolved around the legal provision under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner sought the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court for the release of the muddamal vehicle, arguing that the continued seizure and the resultant deterioration of the vehicle was unnecessary.

The vehicle in question was seized by police during a patrol after being found transporting liquor without the requisite pass or permit, leading to its confiscation under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The petitioner, who is the owner of the vehicle, approached the High Court arguing against the prolonged seizure of the vehicle, which was becoming unutilitarian at the police station.

Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar referenced the precedent set in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, highlighting the problematic nature of vehicles turning into junk due to prolonged seizure. The Court agreed that keeping the seized vehicles at police stations indefinitely serves no practical purpose. It emphasized the need for magistrates to pass orders for the release of such vehicles, taking appropriate bonds and guarantees for their return if required at any stage of the trial.

The High Court directed the release of the petitioner’s vehicle, subject to conditions including furnishing a solvent surety equivalent to the vehicle’s price, an undertaking not to alter the vehicle’s identity, and the requirement to produce the vehicle as directed by the trial court. Additionally, it was ordered that the vehicle’s transfer be restrained till the final disposal of the trial, and any subsequent offence involving the vehicle would lead to its confiscation.

Date of Decision: February 15, 2024.

Babitadevi Ranjitkumar Singh vs. State of Gujarat

Similar News