CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Interim Bail To Father Kotur And Sister Safi Convicted In Sister Abhaya Murder Case: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D: 23 JUNE 2022

Thursday, the Kerala High Court granted Father Thomas Kottoor and Sister Sephy's petition to suspend their sentence in the notorious Sister Abhaya case [Father Thomas Kottoor v. Central Bureau of Investigation].

A division bench comprised of Justices K Vinod Chandran and C Jayachandran issued the order granting them interim bail on the condition that they post 5 lakh in cash and two sureties in the same amount.

The order stated, "On the basis of the evidence presented by the defence and not effectively refuted by the prosecution, we cannot but release the two accused as an interim measure, suspending their sentence pending the outcome of their appeal."

The court has imposed the following conditions:

The petitioners/ accused shall be released on bail upon execution of a bond for 5,00,000 each with two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court; If the conviction and sentence of the petitioners/ appellants is upheld or even modified, the time during which they were so released shall be excluded in computing the term of their sentence as provided in Section 389(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC); They shall not indulge in any other criminal activity.

A CBI Judge in Thiruvananthapuram convicted Kottoor and Sister Sephy, a nun from Pius Convent Kottayam, in December 2020 for the murder of 20-year-old nun Sister Abhaya.

They were subsequently sentenced to life in prison and ordered to pay a 5 lakh fine each. Additionally, Father Kottoor was ordered to pay 1 lakh for house trespass.

Sister Abhaya was discovered murdered in a convent in the Kottayam district of Kerala more than 28 years prior to the CBI Court's decision.

Her body was discovered in the convent's well on March 27,1992. Before it was finally tried in court, the case underwent a number of unexpected turns.

In 1993, the State police filed a report concluding that it was a suicide. The case was then transferred to the CBI after activist Jomon Puthenpurackal filed a lawsuit.

In 1996, however, the CBI filed a report stating that it was unable to determine whether the death was a homicide or a suicide. However, the court rejected the same and ordered a new investigation.

A year later, the CBI determined that the case was indeed a homicide, but there was insufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.

This was again rejected by the court, and a third CBI investigation commenced.

In 2008, Father Thomas Kottoor, Father Jose Poothrukayil, and Sister Sephy were arrested and charged with murder, ten years after the first arrests in the case.

In 2009, the Kerala High Court granted them bail, and Poothrukayil was released.

The verdict was rendered by the CBI court in accordance with an order from the Kerala High Court that criticised the delay and directed that the case be heard daily.

The CBI court's judgement stated, "The evidence on file is more than sufficient to conclude that the unbroken chain of circumstances cumulatively points to the guilt of the accused, leading to a conclusion inconsistent with the accused's innocence."

In January 2021, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court accepted the appeal filed by Father Kottoor.

In the appeal, it was argued that the trial court's decision was tainted by grave illegalities and was based on "unconnected storey circumstances culled from unreliable solitary witnesses," referring to the key witness Adakka Raju.

THOMAS KOTTOOR

Versus

STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News