SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Interim Bail To Father Kotur And Sister Safi Convicted In Sister Abhaya Murder Case: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


D.D: 23 JUNE 2022

Thursday, the Kerala High Court granted Father Thomas Kottoor and Sister Sephy's petition to suspend their sentence in the notorious Sister Abhaya case [Father Thomas Kottoor v. Central Bureau of Investigation].

A division bench comprised of Justices K Vinod Chandran and C Jayachandran issued the order granting them interim bail on the condition that they post 5 lakh in cash and two sureties in the same amount.

The order stated, "On the basis of the evidence presented by the defence and not effectively refuted by the prosecution, we cannot but release the two accused as an interim measure, suspending their sentence pending the outcome of their appeal."

The court has imposed the following conditions:

The petitioners/ accused shall be released on bail upon execution of a bond for 5,00,000 each with two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court; If the conviction and sentence of the petitioners/ appellants is upheld or even modified, the time during which they were so released shall be excluded in computing the term of their sentence as provided in Section 389(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC); They shall not indulge in any other criminal activity.

A CBI Judge in Thiruvananthapuram convicted Kottoor and Sister Sephy, a nun from Pius Convent Kottayam, in December 2020 for the murder of 20-year-old nun Sister Abhaya.

They were subsequently sentenced to life in prison and ordered to pay a 5 lakh fine each. Additionally, Father Kottoor was ordered to pay 1 lakh for house trespass.

Sister Abhaya was discovered murdered in a convent in the Kottayam district of Kerala more than 28 years prior to the CBI Court's decision.

Her body was discovered in the convent's well on March 27,1992. Before it was finally tried in court, the case underwent a number of unexpected turns.

In 1993, the State police filed a report concluding that it was a suicide. The case was then transferred to the CBI after activist Jomon Puthenpurackal filed a lawsuit.

In 1996, however, the CBI filed a report stating that it was unable to determine whether the death was a homicide or a suicide. However, the court rejected the same and ordered a new investigation.

A year later, the CBI determined that the case was indeed a homicide, but there was insufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.

This was again rejected by the court, and a third CBI investigation commenced.

In 2008, Father Thomas Kottoor, Father Jose Poothrukayil, and Sister Sephy were arrested and charged with murder, ten years after the first arrests in the case.

In 2009, the Kerala High Court granted them bail, and Poothrukayil was released.

The verdict was rendered by the CBI court in accordance with an order from the Kerala High Court that criticised the delay and directed that the case be heard daily.

The CBI court's judgement stated, "The evidence on file is more than sufficient to conclude that the unbroken chain of circumstances cumulatively points to the guilt of the accused, leading to a conclusion inconsistent with the accused's innocence."

In January 2021, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court accepted the appeal filed by Father Kottoor.

In the appeal, it was argued that the trial court's decision was tainted by grave illegalities and was based on "unconnected storey circumstances culled from unreliable solitary witnesses," referring to the key witness Adakka Raju.

THOMAS KOTTOOR

Versus

STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News