CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Integrity of Judicial Process Paramount: Karnataka High Court Imposes Fine of Rs 10 Lakh for Irresponsible Media Reporting on New Indian Express

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Karnataka, in a landmark judgment, emphasized the confidentiality in judicial inquiries and the responsibilities of media in reporting on allegations against judicial officers. The Court critically evaluated the conduct of a media house New Indian Express in reporting partial facts and the importance of preserving the integrity of the judicial process.

The case revolved around a retired District and Sessions Judge who sought the removal of a defamatory online news report, initiation and conclusion of a departmental inquiry, and damages against the respondents. The key issues included judicial inquiry into alleged misconduct, media reporting ethics, confidentiality breaches in the judicial inquiry, and compensation claims.

The Court highlighted, “A responsible Newspaper such as the New Indian Express ought to have ascertained complete facts,” stressing the ethical obligations of media in sensitive cases involving judicial officers. The Court criticized the partial reporting of the New Indian Express, leading to misinformation and reputational harm.

The Court observed that the petitioner was exonerated by the Full Court’s decision not to accept the inquiry report, underlining the judiciary's responsibility in conducting impartial and thorough inquiries.

 

The Court underscored, “an inquiry be conducted by the High Court as to how the inquiry Report dated 30.05.2013 became available to the Newspaper,” emphasizing the need to maintain confidentiality and protect the integrity of judicial processes.

Decision: The Court dismissed most of the petitioner's claims, including the request for compensation from the High Court. However, it directed the respondent media house to pay costs for irresponsible reporting. The Court ordered an inquiry into the leak of the confidential report, affirming the balance between judicial integrity, accountability, and media freedom.

Date of Decision: 11th March 2024

XXX, Retired District and Sessions Judge vs High Court of Karnataka and Others

 

Latest Legal News