Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary

Integrity of Judicial Process Paramount: Karnataka High Court Imposes Fine of Rs 10 Lakh for Irresponsible Media Reporting on New Indian Express

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Karnataka, in a landmark judgment, emphasized the confidentiality in judicial inquiries and the responsibilities of media in reporting on allegations against judicial officers. The Court critically evaluated the conduct of a media house New Indian Express in reporting partial facts and the importance of preserving the integrity of the judicial process.

The case revolved around a retired District and Sessions Judge who sought the removal of a defamatory online news report, initiation and conclusion of a departmental inquiry, and damages against the respondents. The key issues included judicial inquiry into alleged misconduct, media reporting ethics, confidentiality breaches in the judicial inquiry, and compensation claims.

The Court highlighted, “A responsible Newspaper such as the New Indian Express ought to have ascertained complete facts,” stressing the ethical obligations of media in sensitive cases involving judicial officers. The Court criticized the partial reporting of the New Indian Express, leading to misinformation and reputational harm.

The Court observed that the petitioner was exonerated by the Full Court’s decision not to accept the inquiry report, underlining the judiciary's responsibility in conducting impartial and thorough inquiries.

 

The Court underscored, “an inquiry be conducted by the High Court as to how the inquiry Report dated 30.05.2013 became available to the Newspaper,” emphasizing the need to maintain confidentiality and protect the integrity of judicial processes.

Decision: The Court dismissed most of the petitioner's claims, including the request for compensation from the High Court. However, it directed the respondent media house to pay costs for irresponsible reporting. The Court ordered an inquiry into the leak of the confidential report, affirming the balance between judicial integrity, accountability, and media freedom.

Date of Decision: 11th March 2024

XXX, Retired District and Sessions Judge vs High Court of Karnataka and Others

 

Similar News