Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff

Insurance Law | Acceptance of Premium and Issuance of Receipt Signify Commencement of Insurance Coverage: Supreme Court Holds in LIC Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has reinstated the orders of the District Forum and State Commission that were in favor of Mrs. Bhumikaben N. Modi & Ors., in their insurance claim dispute with Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Justices A.S. Bopanna and C.T. Ravikumar overturned the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (NCDRC) decision that had dismissed the appellants’ claims following the policyholder’s death.

The core legal issue addressed by the Supreme Court centered on whether the acceptance of a first premium by LIC, followed by the issuance of a policy receipt, established a binding insurance contract prior to the policyholder’s untimely death.

The dispute originated when Mr. Narender Kumar Kantilal Modi, the deceased, submitted his life insurance proposal and premium shortly before dying from an accidental electric shock. Although LIC issued an Acceptance-cum-First Premium Receipt, it later contested the policy’s validity, arguing that the formal acceptance of the proposal had not occurred before Mr. Modi’s death.

The Supreme Court scrutinized the sequence of events and documentary proofs, affirming that the initial forums had rightly determined the existence of a binding contract from the actions of LIC, which included the acknowledgment of premium payment and policy effectuation before Mr. Modi’s demise. The apex court criticized the NCDRC’s contrary decision, underscoring that LIC’s subsequent attempt to block the policy post-death was irrelevant to the contract’s validity.

Justice Ravikumar emphasized, “The issuance of a receipt and acceptance of the premium unequivocally placed the insurer on risk from that date, thereby binding them to the contract terms regardless of subsequent internal actions.”

Decision: By setting aside the NCDRC’s order, the Supreme Court directed LIC to adhere to the original favorable orders and settle the claims according to the policy terms within two months.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024.

Mrs. Bhumikaben N. Modi & Ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Latest Legal News