Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

"Insistence to Abandon Parents and Become 'Ghar Jamai' Amounts to Cruelty": Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted a divorce to a man on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, observing that the insistence of the wife's family for the husband to abandon his parents and become a 'Ghar Jamai' amounts to cruelty.

The Bench comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna delivered the decision on August 11, 2023, setting aside the impugned judgment dated 07.02.2019.

The appellant, Devender Govind Ram Ravin, had sought divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) & 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The couple had been married since 2001 but separated in 2002.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "It needs no reiteration that the bedrock of any matrimonial relationship is cohabitation and conjugal relationship. The very fact that the parties were able to live together barely for six months and since February, 2002, they have been living separately proves that the parties were unable to sustain their matrimonial relationship."

The Court also noted the false complaints filed by the wife against the husband, stating that "the making of false complaint in itself is an act of cruelty." The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments, including Narendra vs K. Meena (2016) 9 SCC 455, which observed that asking a son to separate from his family amounts to cruelty.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the financial difficulties faced by the respondent and appreciated the voluntary payment of three months' rent by learned Senior Counsel. Assurance was also given for the issuance of a BPL Card to the respondent within 15 days of application.

The judgment highlights the importance of cohabitation and conjugal relationship in a marriage and sets a precedent in recognizing the insistence to become a 'Ghar Jamai' as an act of cruelty. It also emphasizes the legal consequences of false complaints in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: August 11, 2023

DEVENDER GOVIND RAM RAVIN vs REKHA

Similar News