Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

"Insistence to Abandon Parents and Become 'Ghar Jamai' Amounts to Cruelty": Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted a divorce to a man on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, observing that the insistence of the wife's family for the husband to abandon his parents and become a 'Ghar Jamai' amounts to cruelty.

The Bench comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna delivered the decision on August 11, 2023, setting aside the impugned judgment dated 07.02.2019.

The appellant, Devender Govind Ram Ravin, had sought divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) & 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The couple had been married since 2001 but separated in 2002.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "It needs no reiteration that the bedrock of any matrimonial relationship is cohabitation and conjugal relationship. The very fact that the parties were able to live together barely for six months and since February, 2002, they have been living separately proves that the parties were unable to sustain their matrimonial relationship."

The Court also noted the false complaints filed by the wife against the husband, stating that "the making of false complaint in itself is an act of cruelty." The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments, including Narendra vs K. Meena (2016) 9 SCC 455, which observed that asking a son to separate from his family amounts to cruelty.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the financial difficulties faced by the respondent and appreciated the voluntary payment of three months' rent by learned Senior Counsel. Assurance was also given for the issuance of a BPL Card to the respondent within 15 days of application.

The judgment highlights the importance of cohabitation and conjugal relationship in a marriage and sets a precedent in recognizing the insistence to become a 'Ghar Jamai' as an act of cruelty. It also emphasizes the legal consequences of false complaints in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: August 11, 2023

DEVENDER GOVIND RAM RAVIN vs REKHA

Latest Legal News