Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

"Insistence to Abandon Parents and Become 'Ghar Jamai' Amounts to Cruelty": Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted a divorce to a man on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, observing that the insistence of the wife's family for the husband to abandon his parents and become a 'Ghar Jamai' amounts to cruelty.

The Bench comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna delivered the decision on August 11, 2023, setting aside the impugned judgment dated 07.02.2019.

The appellant, Devender Govind Ram Ravin, had sought divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) & 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The couple had been married since 2001 but separated in 2002.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "It needs no reiteration that the bedrock of any matrimonial relationship is cohabitation and conjugal relationship. The very fact that the parties were able to live together barely for six months and since February, 2002, they have been living separately proves that the parties were unable to sustain their matrimonial relationship."

The Court also noted the false complaints filed by the wife against the husband, stating that "the making of false complaint in itself is an act of cruelty." The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments, including Narendra vs K. Meena (2016) 9 SCC 455, which observed that asking a son to separate from his family amounts to cruelty.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the financial difficulties faced by the respondent and appreciated the voluntary payment of three months' rent by learned Senior Counsel. Assurance was also given for the issuance of a BPL Card to the respondent within 15 days of application.

The judgment highlights the importance of cohabitation and conjugal relationship in a marriage and sets a precedent in recognizing the insistence to become a 'Ghar Jamai' as an act of cruelty. It also emphasizes the legal consequences of false complaints in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: August 11, 2023

DEVENDER GOVIND RAM RAVIN vs REKHA

Similar News