Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

"Insistence to Abandon Parents and Become 'Ghar Jamai' Amounts to Cruelty": Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted a divorce to a man on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, observing that the insistence of the wife's family for the husband to abandon his parents and become a 'Ghar Jamai' amounts to cruelty.

The Bench comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna delivered the decision on August 11, 2023, setting aside the impugned judgment dated 07.02.2019.

The appellant, Devender Govind Ram Ravin, had sought divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) & 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The couple had been married since 2001 but separated in 2002.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "It needs no reiteration that the bedrock of any matrimonial relationship is cohabitation and conjugal relationship. The very fact that the parties were able to live together barely for six months and since February, 2002, they have been living separately proves that the parties were unable to sustain their matrimonial relationship."

The Court also noted the false complaints filed by the wife against the husband, stating that "the making of false complaint in itself is an act of cruelty." The Court referred to several Supreme Court judgments, including Narendra vs K. Meena (2016) 9 SCC 455, which observed that asking a son to separate from his family amounts to cruelty.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the financial difficulties faced by the respondent and appreciated the voluntary payment of three months' rent by learned Senior Counsel. Assurance was also given for the issuance of a BPL Card to the respondent within 15 days of application.

The judgment highlights the importance of cohabitation and conjugal relationship in a marriage and sets a precedent in recognizing the insistence to become a 'Ghar Jamai' as an act of cruelty. It also emphasizes the legal consequences of false complaints in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: August 11, 2023

DEVENDER GOVIND RAM RAVIN vs REKHA

Latest Legal News