Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Indian Supreme Court Settles Contentious Electricity Tariff Case Between Nabha Power and Punjab State Power

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, India's Supreme Court has settled a prolonged conflict concerning deductions in monthly electricity tariffs under the Electricity Act, 2003. The case pitted Nabha Power Limited against Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and has been presided over by Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sudhanshu Dhulia, and Aravind Kumar. The verdict is poised to influence a host of similar cases going forward.

Originating from a labyrinth of legal procedures that involved various judicial bodies, from the Regulatory Commission to the Appellate Tribunal and ultimately, the Supreme Court, the case has now reached its conclusion. Citing the 2018 case between the same parties, the Court extended relief to Nabha Power concerning the washing costs of coal and the determination of its Gross Calorific Value (GCV).

Furthermore, the Court dealt with contempt charges against Punjab State Power for failing to adhere to prior payment orders. The Court mandated installment payments by the respondent and also gave them the discretion to present future grievances. This led Punjab State Power to submit a new petition to the Regulatory Commission for approval to recoup the paid amounts.

In a move that highlighted the Court’s disapproval of any attempts to sidestep legal obligations, the judges observed that such tactics "can neither be appreciated nor left without consequences." Nabha Power had vehemently opposed reopening any settled matters, arguing that these were maneuvers by Punjab State Power to escape their payment duties under a 2017 judgment.

Remarkably, the Court also allocated legal fees to the appellants, Nabha Power Limited and Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, setting them at Rs. 40 lakhs and Rs. 25 lakhs, respectively.

After six years of protracted legal battles, this landmark decision sets a vital precedent in matters of contractual obligations. It underlines the importance of compliance with judicial orders and the repercussions of trying to bypass them.

The ruling is a clear indication of the Supreme Court’s steadfast commitment to uphold justice and ensures timely compliance with its decisions. The judgment is set to have a considerable ripple effect on upcoming cases, especially within the energy sector.

Date of Decision: October 09, 2023

NABHA POWER LIMITED  vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-NABHA-POWER-LIMITED-Vs-PSPCL.pdf"]

Latest Legal News