Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Indian Supreme Court Settles Contentious Electricity Tariff Case Between Nabha Power and Punjab State Power

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, India's Supreme Court has settled a prolonged conflict concerning deductions in monthly electricity tariffs under the Electricity Act, 2003. The case pitted Nabha Power Limited against Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and has been presided over by Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sudhanshu Dhulia, and Aravind Kumar. The verdict is poised to influence a host of similar cases going forward.

Originating from a labyrinth of legal procedures that involved various judicial bodies, from the Regulatory Commission to the Appellate Tribunal and ultimately, the Supreme Court, the case has now reached its conclusion. Citing the 2018 case between the same parties, the Court extended relief to Nabha Power concerning the washing costs of coal and the determination of its Gross Calorific Value (GCV).

Furthermore, the Court dealt with contempt charges against Punjab State Power for failing to adhere to prior payment orders. The Court mandated installment payments by the respondent and also gave them the discretion to present future grievances. This led Punjab State Power to submit a new petition to the Regulatory Commission for approval to recoup the paid amounts.

In a move that highlighted the Court’s disapproval of any attempts to sidestep legal obligations, the judges observed that such tactics "can neither be appreciated nor left without consequences." Nabha Power had vehemently opposed reopening any settled matters, arguing that these were maneuvers by Punjab State Power to escape their payment duties under a 2017 judgment.

Remarkably, the Court also allocated legal fees to the appellants, Nabha Power Limited and Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, setting them at Rs. 40 lakhs and Rs. 25 lakhs, respectively.

After six years of protracted legal battles, this landmark decision sets a vital precedent in matters of contractual obligations. It underlines the importance of compliance with judicial orders and the repercussions of trying to bypass them.

The ruling is a clear indication of the Supreme Court’s steadfast commitment to uphold justice and ensures timely compliance with its decisions. The judgment is set to have a considerable ripple effect on upcoming cases, especially within the energy sector.

Date of Decision: October 09, 2023

NABHA POWER LIMITED  vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-NABHA-POWER-LIMITED-Vs-PSPCL.pdf"]

Latest Legal News