CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Indian Army Sepoy Got Bail accused of Sharing Confidential Information with Pakistani Smugglers – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


P&H HC while allowed bail of the accused (Malkit Singh @ Fauji Vs State 8 Feb 2023) observed that accused was in custody for 3 years and 9 months and some of accused were already on bail.

After serving over three years in judicial custody, a Sepoy in the Indian Army, Malkit Singh, has been granted regular bail by the court. Singh was accused of sharing confidential information with Pakistani smugglers and secret agencies through WhatsApp and email, leading to his arrest on 09.05.2019. The FIR was registered under various sections of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, IPC, and NDPS Act, 1985, and various documents and mobile phones were recovered from Singh during the investigation.

The defense counsel argued that the charges against Singh could be under Section 3 or Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, with the maximum punishment under Section 5 being 3 years of sentence. The counsel further argued that the trial has been delayed and the punishment, if convicted, would be minimal, making the grant of bail a just and reasonable decision.

The reply filed by the police stated that Singh had admitted in his disclosure statement to providing secret information of the Army to Pakistani smugglers. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the co-accused Harpreet Singh, Gurlal Singh, Princedeep, and Gajjan Singh have already been granted regular bail by the court.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody for over 3 years and 9 months, and some of the co-accused have already been granted regular bail, the court allowed Singh to be released on regular bail. The trial court has yet to take cognizance of the formal complaint under the Official Secrets Act that was filed.

Malkit Singh @ Fauji  Vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News