'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Indian Army Sepoy Got Bail accused of Sharing Confidential Information with Pakistani Smugglers – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


P&H HC while allowed bail of the accused (Malkit Singh @ Fauji Vs State 8 Feb 2023) observed that accused was in custody for 3 years and 9 months and some of accused were already on bail.

After serving over three years in judicial custody, a Sepoy in the Indian Army, Malkit Singh, has been granted regular bail by the court. Singh was accused of sharing confidential information with Pakistani smugglers and secret agencies through WhatsApp and email, leading to his arrest on 09.05.2019. The FIR was registered under various sections of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, IPC, and NDPS Act, 1985, and various documents and mobile phones were recovered from Singh during the investigation.

The defense counsel argued that the charges against Singh could be under Section 3 or Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, with the maximum punishment under Section 5 being 3 years of sentence. The counsel further argued that the trial has been delayed and the punishment, if convicted, would be minimal, making the grant of bail a just and reasonable decision.

The reply filed by the police stated that Singh had admitted in his disclosure statement to providing secret information of the Army to Pakistani smugglers. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the co-accused Harpreet Singh, Gurlal Singh, Princedeep, and Gajjan Singh have already been granted regular bail by the court.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody for over 3 years and 9 months, and some of the co-accused have already been granted regular bail, the court allowed Singh to be released on regular bail. The trial court has yet to take cognizance of the formal complaint under the Official Secrets Act that was filed.

Malkit Singh @ Fauji  Vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News