Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

Indian Army Sepoy Got Bail accused of Sharing Confidential Information with Pakistani Smugglers – P&H HC

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


P&H HC while allowed bail of the accused (Malkit Singh @ Fauji Vs State 8 Feb 2023) observed that accused was in custody for 3 years and 9 months and some of accused were already on bail.

After serving over three years in judicial custody, a Sepoy in the Indian Army, Malkit Singh, has been granted regular bail by the court. Singh was accused of sharing confidential information with Pakistani smugglers and secret agencies through WhatsApp and email, leading to his arrest on 09.05.2019. The FIR was registered under various sections of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, IPC, and NDPS Act, 1985, and various documents and mobile phones were recovered from Singh during the investigation.

The defense counsel argued that the charges against Singh could be under Section 3 or Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, with the maximum punishment under Section 5 being 3 years of sentence. The counsel further argued that the trial has been delayed and the punishment, if convicted, would be minimal, making the grant of bail a just and reasonable decision.

The reply filed by the police stated that Singh had admitted in his disclosure statement to providing secret information of the Army to Pakistani smugglers. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the co-accused Harpreet Singh, Gurlal Singh, Princedeep, and Gajjan Singh have already been granted regular bail by the court.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody for over 3 years and 9 months, and some of the co-accused have already been granted regular bail, the court allowed Singh to be released on regular bail. The trial court has yet to take cognizance of the formal complaint under the Official Secrets Act that was filed.

Malkit Singh @ Fauji  Vs State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News