Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Inconsistencies in Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence in Abetment to Suicide Lead to Acquittal – Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court acquitted all appellants in a case of abetment to suicide and cruelty under Sections 306 and 498-A of IPC. Justice Abhay S. Waghmare observed inconsistencies in the dying declarations and insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges.

Amrut s/o Pundalik Marathe and others appealed against their conviction for abetting the suicide of Shobhabai and inflicting cruelty. The trial court's decision, based on dying declarations and testimonies of family members, was overturned due to inconsistencies and lack of conclusive evidence linking the accused to the suicide.

Facts and Issues: The appellants were charged with persistently and continuously ill-treating Shobhabai, leading to her suicide. The evidence included two dying declarations and testimonies of family members and neighbors. The primary issue was whether these evidences sufficed to establish abetment to suicide and cruelty under the relevant IPC sections.

Inconsistencies in Dying Declarations: The court noted discrepancies between the two dying declarations of Shobhabai, affecting their credibility.

Testimonies of Family Members: The testimonies of Shobhabai's sons and husband were scrutinized, revealing discrepancies and a lack of clear linkage to any abetment.

Legal Position on Abetment and Cruelty: The court reiterated the legal requirements for charges under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC. It was found that the evidence did not meet the necessary standards for abetment or cruelty.

Decision: The Bombay High Court acquitted all appellants, canceling their bail bonds and ordering a refund of any fine deposited. The court emphasized the need for clear evidence of incitement, instigation, or aiding in the act of suicide for charges under Sections 306 and 498-A of IPC.

Date of Decision: 12.03.2024

Amrut and Ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra

Similar News