"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

In Bulli Bai App Case All Accused Out On Bail After Three More Secure Relief :Mumbai Sessions Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Earlier this year, the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate granted bail to three of the defendants, denied bail to Thakur and Singh, and required Bishnoi to withdraw his application for technical reasons.

With the Sessions Court's bail order issued, all six defendants in the case have been granted bail.

Today, the additional sessions judge AB Sharma ordered that the accused be released on bail upon posting a 50,000 bail bond with one or two solvent sureties of the same amount.

The accused was also ordered to visit the cyber police station once per month and prohibited from travelling abroad without the court's permission.

The accused, through their attorney Shivam Deshmukh, filed an application for bail on the following grounds: 1. That they have been falsely implicated and have not committed the alleged offences; 2. That they come from a respectable family and the alleged act is unfathomable; 3. That a Delhi court has already granted them bail for similar offences; 4. That they are unable to obstruct the investigation due to the seizure of all electronic devices.

 

The special prosecutor opposed vehemently all applications. He argued that a prima facie case had been established against them and that the evidence gathered thus far clearly demonstrated the accused's role.

He went on to say that the accused's actions were detrimental to the nation's unity and threatened its very existence. Therefore, he prayed for the application to be denied.

The case began with the appearance of the app "Bulli bai" on the open-source platform GitHub.

The application provided information on more than one hundred prominent Muslim women and allowed users to participate in a virtual "auction" for these women.

On January 1, 2022, the cyber cell of the Mumbai police filed a first information report (FIR) in response to complaints from women who had been targeted by the app.

 

The Delhi Police also filed a separate FIR in relation to the offence.

 

 

Similar News