CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

In Bulli Bai App Case All Accused Out On Bail After Three More Secure Relief :Mumbai Sessions Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Earlier this year, the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate granted bail to three of the defendants, denied bail to Thakur and Singh, and required Bishnoi to withdraw his application for technical reasons.

With the Sessions Court's bail order issued, all six defendants in the case have been granted bail.

Today, the additional sessions judge AB Sharma ordered that the accused be released on bail upon posting a 50,000 bail bond with one or two solvent sureties of the same amount.

The accused was also ordered to visit the cyber police station once per month and prohibited from travelling abroad without the court's permission.

The accused, through their attorney Shivam Deshmukh, filed an application for bail on the following grounds: 1. That they have been falsely implicated and have not committed the alleged offences; 2. That they come from a respectable family and the alleged act is unfathomable; 3. That a Delhi court has already granted them bail for similar offences; 4. That they are unable to obstruct the investigation due to the seizure of all electronic devices.

 

The special prosecutor opposed vehemently all applications. He argued that a prima facie case had been established against them and that the evidence gathered thus far clearly demonstrated the accused's role.

He went on to say that the accused's actions were detrimental to the nation's unity and threatened its very existence. Therefore, he prayed for the application to be denied.

The case began with the appearance of the app "Bulli bai" on the open-source platform GitHub.

The application provided information on more than one hundred prominent Muslim women and allowed users to participate in a virtual "auction" for these women.

On January 1, 2022, the cyber cell of the Mumbai police filed a first information report (FIR) in response to complaints from women who had been targeted by the app.

 

The Delhi Police also filed a separate FIR in relation to the offence.

 

 

Latest Legal News