Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Impartiality Paramount, Adjudication Process Must Reflect Independence: Orissa High Court Quashes Termination of Hindi Teacher and Remits Matter for Fresh Adjudication

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Orissa emphasized the fundamental importance of impartiality and independence in the adjudication process. The court, led by Justice Sashikanta Mishra, addressed the issue of the alleged illegal termination of a Hindi teacher, underscoring the need for adherence to natural justice principles in such procedures.

The petitioner, Kanakalata Pradhan, a Hindi teacher at Sri Jagannath High School since 1988, faced abrupt termination from her position in 1996. The termination process lacked transparent notification and due acknowledgment, leading to a legal battle. The petitioner contended that the school management's decision violated natural justice principles, particularly the failure to provide due process in her termination.

On Natural Justice: The court scrutinized the appeal procedure under the 1983 Circular, which demands adherence to principles of natural justice. "It does not contemplate gathering of evidence by the appellate authority as it would destroy his neutrality," observed Justice Mishra.

On Independence of Adjudication: Justice Mishra cited the Supreme Court’s decision in State of UP vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha, stressing the independence of the adjudicator. "The enquiry officer is in the position of an independent adjudicator and not a representative," he noted, applying this principle to the case at hand.

On Procedural Impropriety: The court found that the Inspector of Schools collected affidavits during the appeal, which was considered improper. "Such action destroys the very sanctity of the proceeding and is a defect which goes to the very root of the matter," the judgment stated.

Decision of Judgement: The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and directing the Director of Secondary Education to rehear the appeal. The rehearing is to be based strictly on existing records, excluding the Inspector's report and the affidavits. The appellate authority is instructed to conclude the matter expeditiously, within two months from the order’s communication.

Date of Decision: 18th March 2024.

Kanakalata Pradhan Vs. Director, Secondary Education, Odisha and Others,

Similar News