Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Impartiality Paramount, Adjudication Process Must Reflect Independence: Orissa High Court Quashes Termination of Hindi Teacher and Remits Matter for Fresh Adjudication

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Orissa emphasized the fundamental importance of impartiality and independence in the adjudication process. The court, led by Justice Sashikanta Mishra, addressed the issue of the alleged illegal termination of a Hindi teacher, underscoring the need for adherence to natural justice principles in such procedures.

The petitioner, Kanakalata Pradhan, a Hindi teacher at Sri Jagannath High School since 1988, faced abrupt termination from her position in 1996. The termination process lacked transparent notification and due acknowledgment, leading to a legal battle. The petitioner contended that the school management's decision violated natural justice principles, particularly the failure to provide due process in her termination.

On Natural Justice: The court scrutinized the appeal procedure under the 1983 Circular, which demands adherence to principles of natural justice. "It does not contemplate gathering of evidence by the appellate authority as it would destroy his neutrality," observed Justice Mishra.

On Independence of Adjudication: Justice Mishra cited the Supreme Court’s decision in State of UP vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha, stressing the independence of the adjudicator. "The enquiry officer is in the position of an independent adjudicator and not a representative," he noted, applying this principle to the case at hand.

On Procedural Impropriety: The court found that the Inspector of Schools collected affidavits during the appeal, which was considered improper. "Such action destroys the very sanctity of the proceeding and is a defect which goes to the very root of the matter," the judgment stated.

Decision of Judgement: The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and directing the Director of Secondary Education to rehear the appeal. The rehearing is to be based strictly on existing records, excluding the Inspector's report and the affidavits. The appellate authority is instructed to conclude the matter expeditiously, within two months from the order’s communication.

Date of Decision: 18th March 2024.

Kanakalata Pradhan Vs. Director, Secondary Education, Odisha and Others,

Latest Legal News