Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Immediate Entitlement to Pension and Benefits Casts Duty on State: Punjab and Haryana High Court Directs Payment of Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed the issue of delayed payment of retiral benefits, emphasizing the state's duty to ensure timely disbursement. Justice Namit Kumar, in the case of Jatinder Pal Singh Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, underscored the government's obligation to promptly release retirement benefits, including General Provident Fund (GPF) and gratuity, to its employees.

The petitioner, a retired Assistant Engineer, sought the issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing an order denying interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits, alongside a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release interest on delayed payment of GPF and gratuity. The core legal point revolved around the entitlement of a retired employee to interest on delayed retiral benefits.

Jatinder Pal Singh, the petitioner, faced delays in receiving his retiral benefits post-retirement in 2013. After serving a legal notice and filing a previous writ petition, the respondents directed to consider his claim, refused to pay interest on the delayed benefits, leading to the current petition. The respondents justified the delay citing the petitioner's late submission of necessary documents, including property details under Conduct Rules.

Justice Namit Kumar, after examining the arguments and precedents, observed that the delay in releasing gratuity and GPF payments was unjustified. Citing the A.S. Randhawa and J.S. Cheema cases, the Court noted that employees are entitled to interest on delayed payments when the delay is not justifiable. The Court found that there was no reasonable ground to withhold the gratuity payment post the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner.

The High Court partly allowed the writ petition. The Court directed the respondents to pay interest on the GPF amount from the date of retirement to the date of payment at the applicable GPF interest rate. Furthermore, the Court ordered the payment of 6% interest on delayed gratuity from the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings to the date of gratuity payment.

Date of Decision: 13.02.2024

Jatinder Pal Singh Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:11 PM
Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 10:48 AM
Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case