Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Husband's 'Fault in Not Allowing Wife to Reside with Him' – Divorce Petition Dismissed – Chhattisgarh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, in a landmark judgment, dismissed a divorce appeal filed by the appellant, Mr. Ravishankar Shrivas, against his wife, Smt. Sarita Sen. The Court observed that the husband was at 'fault in not allowing his wife to reside with him,' thereby ruling in favor of the wife.

On 25th September 2023, Hon'ble Shri Goutam Bhaduri & Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ delivered a judgment that has set a precedent on what constitutes valid grounds for divorce in marital disputes. The appellant/husband had initially filed for divorce on the basis of cruelty and desertion, a plea which had been dismissed by the Judge, Family Court, Janjgir on 28th June 2019. Unhappy with the decision, Mr. Shrivas approached the High Court.

The judges highlighted that Mr. Shrivas himself had 'refused to allow his wife to reside with him at the place of his posting,' and had provided no reasonable justification for doing so. The Court cited the counseling proceedings from 13th October 2010, where Mrs. Sen had expressed a desire to reside with her husband, but the appellant himself did not agree for the same.

"Admittedly, the appellant/husband himself refused to allow his wife to reside with him at the place of his posting and he has not stated any reason therefor," observed the Court. In light of these facts, the Court found that the appellant had failed to prove that he was treated with cruelty, and that the ground of desertion was also not proved.

Quoting from the Supreme Court's illustrative instances for mental cruelty in the case of Samar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh, the judges found none of the conditions met in the case at hand.

The Court hence dismissed the divorce appeal, adding that "mere assertion in the plaint that the wife is residing separately since December 2009, for any sufficient cause, is not found to be proved."

This judgment serves as a crucial reminder that both parties in a marriage have obligations and responsibilities, and one cannot easily lay blame on the other without self-examination. Legal experts predict that the ruling will influence future cases on marital disputes, particularly those involving claims of cruelty and desertion.

Date of Decision: 25.09.2023

Ravishankar Shrivas  vs Smt. Sarita Sen                

 

Latest Legal News