Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Husband's 'Fault in Not Allowing Wife to Reside with Him' – Divorce Petition Dismissed – Chhattisgarh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, in a landmark judgment, dismissed a divorce appeal filed by the appellant, Mr. Ravishankar Shrivas, against his wife, Smt. Sarita Sen. The Court observed that the husband was at 'fault in not allowing his wife to reside with him,' thereby ruling in favor of the wife.

On 25th September 2023, Hon'ble Shri Goutam Bhaduri & Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ delivered a judgment that has set a precedent on what constitutes valid grounds for divorce in marital disputes. The appellant/husband had initially filed for divorce on the basis of cruelty and desertion, a plea which had been dismissed by the Judge, Family Court, Janjgir on 28th June 2019. Unhappy with the decision, Mr. Shrivas approached the High Court.

The judges highlighted that Mr. Shrivas himself had 'refused to allow his wife to reside with him at the place of his posting,' and had provided no reasonable justification for doing so. The Court cited the counseling proceedings from 13th October 2010, where Mrs. Sen had expressed a desire to reside with her husband, but the appellant himself did not agree for the same.

"Admittedly, the appellant/husband himself refused to allow his wife to reside with him at the place of his posting and he has not stated any reason therefor," observed the Court. In light of these facts, the Court found that the appellant had failed to prove that he was treated with cruelty, and that the ground of desertion was also not proved.

Quoting from the Supreme Court's illustrative instances for mental cruelty in the case of Samar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh, the judges found none of the conditions met in the case at hand.

The Court hence dismissed the divorce appeal, adding that "mere assertion in the plaint that the wife is residing separately since December 2009, for any sufficient cause, is not found to be proved."

This judgment serves as a crucial reminder that both parties in a marriage have obligations and responsibilities, and one cannot easily lay blame on the other without self-examination. Legal experts predict that the ruling will influence future cases on marital disputes, particularly those involving claims of cruelty and desertion.

Date of Decision: 25.09.2023

Ravishankar Shrivas  vs Smt. Sarita Sen                

 

Latest Legal News