Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Husband’s Duty to Provide Maintenance Irrespective of Income: Allahabad High Court Upholds Maintenance Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that reaffirms the responsibility of a husband to provide maintenance to his wife, the Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order of maintenance granted by the Family Court. The case, titled Kamal vs. State Of U.P, was presided over by Hon’ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J.

The revisionist, Kamal, had contested the Family Court's decision which directed him to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 2,000 to his wife. The revisionist’s argument hinged on the claim that his wife was self-sufficient and living in adultery. However, the court found these claims unsubstantiated.

In her judgment, Hon’ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J., emphasized the husband’s duty to maintain his wife, stating, “For the sake of argument, if the court presumed that the revisionist has no income from his job or from rent of Maruti Van, even then the revisionist is duty-bound to provide maintenance to his wife.” This statement highlights the court’s stance on the fundamental responsibility of a husband towards his wife’s maintenance, irrespective of his income or her alleged earning capacity.

The court noted the lack of documentary evidence regarding the wife’s alleged income and the revisionist’s illness. It was also observed that the revisionist, being the only son, had agricultural income from land in his father’s name. Hon’ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J., pointed out, “It is also evident from the record that the revisionist is a healthy man and is capable of earning money and is liable to maintain his wife.”

Rejecting the claim of adultery due to a lack of evidence, the court upheld the Family Court’s order, deeming the amount of Rs. 2,000 per month as a ‘meager amount’ considering the liabilities and assets of the revisionist.

The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the revision petition and an upholding of the Family Court’s decision dated February 21, 2023. The court also ordered the trial court to take coercive action against the revisionist for the recovery of maintenance.

Date of Decision: 25.01.2024

Kamal VS State Of U.P 

 

Latest Legal News