TRAI Issuing Directions To Enforce Regulations Is Not 'Adjudication' Of Dispute, Does Not Usurp TDSAT's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Candidate Can Challenge Selection Process After Participating If Arbitrariness Is Writ Large Or Rules Changed Mid-Way: Supreme Court Selection Committee Cannot Superimpose Additional Cut-Off Marks Not Prescribed In Rules: Supreme Court Litigants Must Ordinarily Approach High Court First For Quashing FIRs, Article 32 Is For Exceptional Circumstances: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Club Multiple FIRs In Cyber Fraud Case, Says Similar Modus Operandi Does Not Constitute 'Same Transaction' Layman Borrowers Not Liable For Forgery If Even Bank's Legal Experts Failed To Detect Fabrication In Title Deeds: Allahabad High Court Kerala High Court Orders Travancore Devaswom Board To Digitise Sabarimala Asset Inventory, Says Current Records Resemble 'Betel Shop' Ledger Second Husband In Void Marriage Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry Death Under Section 80 BNS: Allahabad High Court Cohabitation Of Barely 3 Months Insufficient To Trigger Presumption Of Live-In Relationship For Maintenance: Bombay High Court SC/ST Act Case Filed By Suspended Head Constable To 'Wreck Vengeance' Against Investigating Officers Quashed: Andhra Pradesh High Court Non-Compliance With Order For Production Of Documents Under O.11 R.14 CPC Cannot Warrant Striking Off Defence: Calcutta High Court Omission To Put Dying Declaration To Accused Under Section 313 CrPC Makes It Inadmissible, But Doesn't Demolish Entire Prosecution Case: Delhi High Court Victim's Appeal Against Magistrate's Acquittal Order Lies Before Sessions Court Under Section 413 BNSS: Gujarat High Court 'Fraud And Justice Cannot Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Quashes 30-Year-Old Land Acquisition After Records Of Compensation Go Missing Electricity Authorities Cannot Determine Civil Liability For Energy Theft Under Section 135; Only Special Court Empowered: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Exploit Employees By Keeping Them On Part-Time Basis For Decades To Deny Old Pension Scheme: Punjab & Haryana HC

Humanitarian Grounds Cannot Undermine Investigation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Interim Bail in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam

26 November 2024 8:07 PM

By: sayum


Himachal Pradesh High Court granted interim bail to Rajdeep Singh, accused of significant involvement in a ₹200 crore scholarship scam, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Justice Virender Singh allowed the bail to enable the applicant to attend to his father-in-law’s ankle surgery scheduled for November 28, 2024. The bail period is from November 25, 2024, to December 15, 2024, with stringent conditions to ensure non-interference in the ongoing investigation.

The case concerns alleged large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds intended for SC, ST, and OBC students under the Post Matric Scholarship Scheme. The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) accused Singh and others of creating shell entities, falsifying student enrollments, and fraudulently claiming funds. The ED alleged that Singh's actions, including submitting forged documents and siphoning funds, amounted to proceeds of crime exceeding ₹28 crore.

Singh, arrested on August 30, 2023, sought interim bail citing his father-in-law’s medical condition and his wife’s inability to assist due to her own health issues.

The Court highlighted the specific circumstances of the applicant’s request, noting:

"The interim relief is granted solely on humanitarian grounds to care for his father-in-law undergoing surgery. This decision does not dilute the gravity of the allegations or impede the investigation."

The ED opposed the bail, arguing that the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA—requiring satisfaction of non-guilt and non-likelihood of offense repetition—were not met. However, the Court clarified:

"While the twin conditions hold paramount importance, their application in interim bail cases on specific grounds can be flexible, ensuring the balance between individual liberty and investigation integrity."

Acknowledging the ED's concerns about evidence tampering and witness inducement, the Court imposed strict bail conditions, stating:

"The applicant must comply scrupulously with all bail conditions, ensuring no interference with the prosecution's ongoing efforts."

Bail Conditions

The Court granted interim bail with the following stipulations:

Personal Bond: ₹50,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Geographical Restriction: The applicant is restricted to his father-in-law’s surgery location.

Non-Tampering Assurance: The applicant must avoid tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Travel Ban: The applicant cannot leave India without prior Court permission.

Surrender Deadline: The applicant must surrender on December 16, 2024, at 10:00 AM.

The ED retains the right to seek bail cancellation if any conditions are violated.

This decision underscores the judiciary’s balanced approach to upholding individual rights in exceptional circumstances without compromising the seriousness of allegations under the PMLA. The High Court's ruling ensures that humanitarian considerations are addressed while maintaining strict oversight to protect the investigation's integrity.

Date of Decision: November 22, 2024

Latest Legal News