Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail Emphasizing Right to Speedy Trial and Constitutional Parameters

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a historic verdict, the Himachal Pradesh High Court granted bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, while stressing the significance of the right to speedy trial and adherence to constitutional principles. The judgment, pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Virender Singh on July 24, 2023, highlights the delicate balance between an accused's right to freedom and society's interest in combatting drug-related offenses.

The Court's analysis of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, brought to light the need to avoid prolonged imprisonment and unjust detention. Justice Virender Singh remarked, *"The prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution."*

The ruling also addresses the issue of overcrowded jails and the adverse consequences of extended confinement on prisoners. The Court recognized that inmates, particularly those from vulnerable economic backgrounds, often suffer the loss of livelihood, separation from families, and alienation from society.

Moreover, the judgment reiterates the importance of concluding trials swiftly, especially in cases involving stringent provisions like Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Justice Virender Singh emphasized, "The only manner in which such special conditions can be considered within constitutional parameters is where the court is reasonably satisfied on a prima facie look at the material on record that the accused is not guilty."

The Court urged the authorities to expedite trial proceedings, as undue delays may lead to a violation of fundamental rights. Justice Singh asserted that *"the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."*

This landmark judgment reaffirms the High Court's commitment to safeguarding citizens' rights and upholding principles of justice, fairness, and reasonableness. The Court's stance on granting bail to individuals who have endured prolonged incarceration sends a strong message on the significance of protecting individual liberties and ensuring the timely delivery of justice.

Date of Decision: July 24, 2023

Mangal Chand  vs State of Himachal Pradesh 

 

Similar News