Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail Emphasizing Right to Speedy Trial and Constitutional Parameters

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a historic verdict, the Himachal Pradesh High Court granted bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, while stressing the significance of the right to speedy trial and adherence to constitutional principles. The judgment, pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Virender Singh on July 24, 2023, highlights the delicate balance between an accused's right to freedom and society's interest in combatting drug-related offenses.

The Court's analysis of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, brought to light the need to avoid prolonged imprisonment and unjust detention. Justice Virender Singh remarked, *"The prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution."*

The ruling also addresses the issue of overcrowded jails and the adverse consequences of extended confinement on prisoners. The Court recognized that inmates, particularly those from vulnerable economic backgrounds, often suffer the loss of livelihood, separation from families, and alienation from society.

Moreover, the judgment reiterates the importance of concluding trials swiftly, especially in cases involving stringent provisions like Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Justice Virender Singh emphasized, "The only manner in which such special conditions can be considered within constitutional parameters is where the court is reasonably satisfied on a prima facie look at the material on record that the accused is not guilty."

The Court urged the authorities to expedite trial proceedings, as undue delays may lead to a violation of fundamental rights. Justice Singh asserted that *"the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."*

This landmark judgment reaffirms the High Court's commitment to safeguarding citizens' rights and upholding principles of justice, fairness, and reasonableness. The Court's stance on granting bail to individuals who have endured prolonged incarceration sends a strong message on the significance of protecting individual liberties and ensuring the timely delivery of justice.

Date of Decision: July 24, 2023

Mangal Chand  vs State of Himachal Pradesh 

 

Similar News