Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail Emphasizing Right to Speedy Trial and Constitutional Parameters

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a historic verdict, the Himachal Pradesh High Court granted bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, while stressing the significance of the right to speedy trial and adherence to constitutional principles. The judgment, pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Virender Singh on July 24, 2023, highlights the delicate balance between an accused's right to freedom and society's interest in combatting drug-related offenses.

The Court's analysis of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, brought to light the need to avoid prolonged imprisonment and unjust detention. Justice Virender Singh remarked, *"The prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution."*

The ruling also addresses the issue of overcrowded jails and the adverse consequences of extended confinement on prisoners. The Court recognized that inmates, particularly those from vulnerable economic backgrounds, often suffer the loss of livelihood, separation from families, and alienation from society.

Moreover, the judgment reiterates the importance of concluding trials swiftly, especially in cases involving stringent provisions like Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Justice Virender Singh emphasized, "The only manner in which such special conditions can be considered within constitutional parameters is where the court is reasonably satisfied on a prima facie look at the material on record that the accused is not guilty."

The Court urged the authorities to expedite trial proceedings, as undue delays may lead to a violation of fundamental rights. Justice Singh asserted that *"the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."*

This landmark judgment reaffirms the High Court's commitment to safeguarding citizens' rights and upholding principles of justice, fairness, and reasonableness. The Court's stance on granting bail to individuals who have endured prolonged incarceration sends a strong message on the significance of protecting individual liberties and ensuring the timely delivery of justice.

Date of Decision: July 24, 2023

Mangal Chand  vs State of Himachal Pradesh 

 

Latest Legal News