Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Himachal High Court Upholds Fraud Charges in ₹27 Crore Scam: Cooperative Society Members Face Trial for Fictitious Loans

02 October 2024 9:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Himachal Pradesh High Court rejected the petition filed by Sharwan Singh and another member of a cooperative society to discharge them from fraud and conspiracy charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The charges stem from a fraudulent loan disbursal case involving ₹27 crore, in which the petitioners were accused of signing fictitious resolutions as members of the managing committee.

The case arose from allegations of financial irregularities in Tillai Gram Sewa Sehkari Sabha Samiti, where loans totaling ₹27 crores were fraudulently disbursed to fictitious loanees. The cooperative’s secretary and certain members of the managing committee were accused of facilitating the disbursal without following proper procedures. Investigations revealed that fraudulent promissory notes were used, and large sums were transferred to the secretary's personal account.

The petitioners contended that they were not involved in the fraudulent transactions and were not members when the fraudulent loans were sanctioned. However, the court noted that prima facie evidence, including their signatures on the resolution, indicated their involvement in the conspiracy. The court cited:

“The learned Trial Court had rightly held that the petitioners could not be discharged based on the material placed before the Court.”

The court also emphasized that it was not the stage to assess the evidence fully but to determine if there were sufficient grounds for framing charges.

The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges against the petitioners, noting that the allegations were serious and involved a large sum of unrecovered money. The court referred to multiple precedents, stating that at the stage of framing charges, the evidence must be assumed to be true. The petitioners' defense, claiming they were not part of the resolutions, was deemed a matter for trial.

The petition to quash the charges was dismissed, and the court ordered the petitioners to appear before the trial court on October 23, 2024, to proceed with the trial.

Sharwan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Similar News