IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

Himachal High Court Upholds Fraud Charges in ₹27 Crore Scam: Cooperative Society Members Face Trial for Fictitious Loans

02 October 2024 9:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Himachal Pradesh High Court rejected the petition filed by Sharwan Singh and another member of a cooperative society to discharge them from fraud and conspiracy charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The charges stem from a fraudulent loan disbursal case involving ₹27 crore, in which the petitioners were accused of signing fictitious resolutions as members of the managing committee.

The case arose from allegations of financial irregularities in Tillai Gram Sewa Sehkari Sabha Samiti, where loans totaling ₹27 crores were fraudulently disbursed to fictitious loanees. The cooperative’s secretary and certain members of the managing committee were accused of facilitating the disbursal without following proper procedures. Investigations revealed that fraudulent promissory notes were used, and large sums were transferred to the secretary's personal account.

The petitioners contended that they were not involved in the fraudulent transactions and were not members when the fraudulent loans were sanctioned. However, the court noted that prima facie evidence, including their signatures on the resolution, indicated their involvement in the conspiracy. The court cited:

“The learned Trial Court had rightly held that the petitioners could not be discharged based on the material placed before the Court.”

The court also emphasized that it was not the stage to assess the evidence fully but to determine if there were sufficient grounds for framing charges.

The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges against the petitioners, noting that the allegations were serious and involved a large sum of unrecovered money. The court referred to multiple precedents, stating that at the stage of framing charges, the evidence must be assumed to be true. The petitioners' defense, claiming they were not part of the resolutions, was deemed a matter for trial.

The petition to quash the charges was dismissed, and the court ordered the petitioners to appear before the trial court on October 23, 2024, to proceed with the trial.

Sharwan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Similar News