Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Himachal High Court Upholds Fraud Charges in ₹27 Crore Scam: Cooperative Society Members Face Trial for Fictitious Loans

02 October 2024 9:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Himachal Pradesh High Court rejected the petition filed by Sharwan Singh and another member of a cooperative society to discharge them from fraud and conspiracy charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The charges stem from a fraudulent loan disbursal case involving ₹27 crore, in which the petitioners were accused of signing fictitious resolutions as members of the managing committee.

The case arose from allegations of financial irregularities in Tillai Gram Sewa Sehkari Sabha Samiti, where loans totaling ₹27 crores were fraudulently disbursed to fictitious loanees. The cooperative’s secretary and certain members of the managing committee were accused of facilitating the disbursal without following proper procedures. Investigations revealed that fraudulent promissory notes were used, and large sums were transferred to the secretary's personal account.

The petitioners contended that they were not involved in the fraudulent transactions and were not members when the fraudulent loans were sanctioned. However, the court noted that prima facie evidence, including their signatures on the resolution, indicated their involvement in the conspiracy. The court cited:

“The learned Trial Court had rightly held that the petitioners could not be discharged based on the material placed before the Court.”

The court also emphasized that it was not the stage to assess the evidence fully but to determine if there were sufficient grounds for framing charges.

The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges against the petitioners, noting that the allegations were serious and involved a large sum of unrecovered money. The court referred to multiple precedents, stating that at the stage of framing charges, the evidence must be assumed to be true. The petitioners' defense, claiming they were not part of the resolutions, was deemed a matter for trial.

The petition to quash the charges was dismissed, and the court ordered the petitioners to appear before the trial court on October 23, 2024, to proceed with the trial.

Sharwan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Latest Legal News