Without Partition By Metes And Bounds, Co-Sharer Cannot Seek Recovery Of Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Order VII Rule 7 CPC Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff Entitled To Declaration Of Title Over Undivided Half Share Despite Claiming Entire Property Under Gift Deed Supreme Court Reaffirms Legality Of Remainder Of Natural Life Sentences Without Remission, Dismisses Batch Of Writ Petitions 'State Cannot Take Advantage Of Its Own Wrong': Supreme Court Holds Promotees Entitled To Count Ad Hoc Service For Seniority If Within Quota 'Elevators Are Common Carriers, Entail Heightened Duty of Care': Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Holding OTIS Principally Liable For Death Due To Malfunctioning Lift Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, Holds Reach Stacker Operating in Custom-Bonded ICD Area Is Not a "Motor Vehicle" Missing ACRs Due To Illegal Termination Cannot Block Higher Judicial Pay Scales: Supreme Court Grants Relief To Rajasthan Judicial Officer Subsequent Suit Generally Transferable To Court Where Earlier Suit On Same Subject Matter Is Pending: Allahabad High Court Successive Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Under BNSS If Fact Situation Changes Or Previous Findings Become Obsolete: Andhra Pradesh High Court Tenant's "Deemed Purchaser" Right Defeated By Retrospective Notification Under Section 88(1)(b) Of Tenancy Act: Bombay High Court Buyer Not Entitled To Refund Of Earnest Money Once Sale Deed Is Duly Executed Under The Agreement: Calcutta High Court Contradictory Pleas Vitiate Defence; Drawer Liable Even If Signed Blank Cheque Was Handed Over: Delhi High Court Working Mother's Relocation To Another City Not A Ground To Completely Deny Overnight Custody To Father: Karnataka High Court Civil Courts Barred From Granting Injunctions Against SARFAESI Actions Even If Partition Suit Is Maintainable: Kerala High Court S.147 NI Act Is A Special Law, Overrides S.320 CrPC; Offence Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Appeal: Madras High Court Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court

Himachal High Court Upholds Fraud Charges in ₹27 Crore Scam: Cooperative Society Members Face Trial for Fictitious Loans

02 October 2024 9:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Himachal Pradesh High Court rejected the petition filed by Sharwan Singh and another member of a cooperative society to discharge them from fraud and conspiracy charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The charges stem from a fraudulent loan disbursal case involving ₹27 crore, in which the petitioners were accused of signing fictitious resolutions as members of the managing committee.

The case arose from allegations of financial irregularities in Tillai Gram Sewa Sehkari Sabha Samiti, where loans totaling ₹27 crores were fraudulently disbursed to fictitious loanees. The cooperative’s secretary and certain members of the managing committee were accused of facilitating the disbursal without following proper procedures. Investigations revealed that fraudulent promissory notes were used, and large sums were transferred to the secretary's personal account.

The petitioners contended that they were not involved in the fraudulent transactions and were not members when the fraudulent loans were sanctioned. However, the court noted that prima facie evidence, including their signatures on the resolution, indicated their involvement in the conspiracy. The court cited:

“The learned Trial Court had rightly held that the petitioners could not be discharged based on the material placed before the Court.”

The court also emphasized that it was not the stage to assess the evidence fully but to determine if there were sufficient grounds for framing charges.

The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges against the petitioners, noting that the allegations were serious and involved a large sum of unrecovered money. The court referred to multiple precedents, stating that at the stage of framing charges, the evidence must be assumed to be true. The petitioners' defense, claiming they were not part of the resolutions, was deemed a matter for trial.

The petition to quash the charges was dismissed, and the court ordered the petitioners to appear before the trial court on October 23, 2024, to proceed with the trial.

Sharwan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Latest Legal News