MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Upholds Principles of Natural Justice in Quashing Unjust Recovery Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, presided by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Battu Devanand, delivered a landmark judgment on 16th November 2023, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The Court’s decision in W.P.(MD) No.1121 of 2017 set aside an order for the recovery of compensation from Block Development Officers, including the petitioner, for an electrocution incident dating back to 2005.

The petitioner approached the Court challenging an order issued by the first respondent, which directed the recovery of a sum apportioned among several Block Development Officers for an electrocution incident in Kadambangudi Village. The petitioner, who joined as a Block Development Officer after the incident and subsequent legal proceedings, argued that he was wrongfully held responsible for the financial implications of an ex-parte decree.

In his ruling, Justice Devanand noted, “the impugned order issued is against the principles of natural justice and as such, it is not sustainable under law.” The judgment highlighted the absence of a notice or an opportunity for the petitioner to present his case before the recovery order was issued. The Court underscored the importance of individual responsibility and the necessity of establishing clear causal links before imposing penalties.

The decision has been widely appreciated by legal experts for upholding the tenets of fairness and due process. By setting aside the impugned order and ordering the return of the recovered amount to the petitioner, the Court affirmed the critical need for administrative actions to align with the principles of natural justice, especially in cases involving government officials.

 Date of Decision: 16.11.2023

D.Raghunathan VS The District Collector

Latest Legal News