Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

"High Court Upholds Life Sentences in Notorious Ahsan Murder Case: 'The Evidence Rings with the Truth'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court at the Indore Bench, comprising Justices Vivek Rusia and Anil Verma, affirmed the life imprisonment sentences of the appellants involved in the murder of Ahsan. The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and testimonies, dismissing the appeals filed against the Sessions Court's judgment in Criminal Appeals No. 917, 936, and 988 of 2013.

The appellants, Kammu @ Kamlesh, Sheju Mewati @ Shahjad Kha, Ansar, Rijwan @ Tinu, and Jafar, were convicted under Sections 120-B and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for their involvement in a calculated and brutal murder conspiracy. The case, which sent shockwaves through the community, centered around the killing of Ahsan, who was shot dead following a premeditated plan by the accused.

In their judgment, the High Court judges stated, "The trial court has rightly held that such contradictions and omissions are trivial in nature and same is neither material nor sufficient to discard their testimony which are duly corroborated by statement of each other.” This observation was critical in dismissing the appellants' claims of contradictions and omissions in the prosecution's case.

The pivotal evidence in the case included the testimony of the key eyewitness, Naushad (PW-2), and the medical evidence provided by Dr. D.K. Sharma (PW-8), who conducted the postmortem. The court noted that despite some witnesses turning hostile, the overall evidence, including the forensic analysis, supported the prosecution's narrative.

The High Court, referring to precedents set by the Supreme Court, highlighted the importance of the credibility of eyewitness accounts and the need for scrutiny. "Discrepancies which do not shake the credibility of the witnesses and the basic version of the prosecution case to be discarded,” the bench noted, emphasizing the solidity of the evidence presented.

The judges concluded by affirming the trial court's decision, stating, "We hold that the trial Court has rightly convicted and sentenced the aforesaid appellants.” They directed the appellants, who were out on bail, to surrender within 15 days to serve their remaining sentences.

This ruling reinforces the judiciary's commitment to ensuring justice in criminal cases, even in the face of challenges and appeals. The Ahsan murder case, with its complexities and implications, thus reaches a conclusive end, upholding the rule of law and the sanctity of the judicial process in India.

Date of Decided on: 21-03-2024

KAMMU @ KAMLESH S/O KAILASH MALI AND OTHERS Vs.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Similar News