Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Bar of Civil Courts in SARFAESI Act Cases: Limited Scope for Civil Court Intervention in Secured Asset Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has delivered a significant ruling in CR-7563-2019, reinforcing the limited scope of civil court intervention in cases involving the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act). Justice Vikram Aggarwal, in a landmark judgment, upheld the lower courts’ decision to reject a plaint, emphasizing the jurisdictional limitations imposed on civil courts by the SARFAESI Act.

The case, involving Kunal Sharma as the petitioner against Hero Fincorp Ltd. And others, was pivotal in defining the contours of the civil court’s jurisdiction in loan transaction disputes. The petitioner challenged the orders of the lower courts, which had rejected his plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the civil court lacked jurisdiction in light of the SARFAESI Act.

In his ruling, Justice Aggarwal quoted, “To a very limited extent jurisdiction of the civil court can also be invoked, where for example, the action of the secured creditor is alleged to be fraudulent or his claim may be so absurd and untenable which may not require any probe whatsoever.” This statement underscores the High Court’s recognition of the SARFAESI Act’s role in limiting civil court involvement in secured asset disputes.

The judgment also clarified that while allegations of fraud in loan transactions might arise, these issues are predominantly within the purview of the Debts Recovery Tribunal as per the SARFAESI Act. The court noted that accepting such contentions in civil courts could undermine the efficacy of the SARFAESI Act, leading to its provisions being defeated in cases involving loans and guarantees.

The dismissal of the revision petition by the High Court has set a clear precedent that disputes related to enforcement of security interests under the SARFAESI Act fall outside the jurisdiction of civil courts. This decision is expected to streamline the process of loan recovery and enforcement of security interests, reinforcing the authority of the Debts Recovery Tribunal in such matters.

Date of Decision: 28.11.2023

Kunal Sharma VS Hero Fincorp Ltd. and others

 

Latest Legal News