Right Of Private Defence Not Available To Aggressors Who Create Situations Of Peril: Allahabad High Court National Security Concerns Outweigh Right To Bail In Espionage Cases: Andhra Pradesh High Court Denies Relief To Navy Sailor Accused Of Spying For Pakistan Wives Are Not Deemed Maids, Marriage Is A Partnership Of Equals: Bombay High Court Rejects Household Chores As Ground For Cruelty Divorce Economic Offences Affect Financial Fabric Of Society; Custodial Interrogation May Be Necessary: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses Anil Tuteja's Bail In Mahadev App Case Municipalities Are 'Persons' Under WB Highways Act; Can't Build On PWD Land Without Permission: Calcutta High Court Sale Of Secured Asset At Reserve Price Requires Borrower’s Consent; Authorised Officer Cannot Confirm Sale Unilaterally: Andhra Pradesh High Court Procedural Safeguards Mandatory Even In National Security Cases: Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail Over Non-Supply Of Written Grounds Of Arrest Compassionate Appointment Not A Ladder For Career Growth; Second Claim For Higher Post Not Permissible: Allahabad High Court High Court Can't Invoke Inherent Powers To Allow 'Backdoor Entry' For Second Revision Unless Gross Injustice Is Established: Delhi High Court Court Cannot Presume Unsound Mind Merely Because Of Hearing & Speech Disability; Inquiry Under Order 32 Rule 15 CPC Mandatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 138 NI Act: Technical Omission In Complaint Filed By POA Holder Cured If Original Complainant Testifies During Trial; Kerala High Court Direct Evidence Of Sexual Intercourse Not Always Possible; Circumstantial Evidence Of Proximity Sufficient To Prove Adultery: Madras High Court 21 Years Service Is Not Temporary: Orissa HC Directs Regularization Of Drivers, Says State Can’t Exploit Workers Through Perennial 'Ad-Hocism' Reinstatement Not Automatic For Section 25-F ID Act Violations; Punjab & Haryana HC Awards ₹1 Lakh Per Year Compensation To Superannuated Workman Section 82 CrPC Requirements Mandatory; Order Declaring Person Proclaimed Vitiated If Fresh Proclamation Not Issued Upon Adjournment: Punjab & Haryana HC Stay On Blacklisting Order Does Not Efface Underlying Fact; Bidder Must Make Candid Disclosure: Delhi High Court

High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Bar of Civil Courts in SARFAESI Act Cases: Limited Scope for Civil Court Intervention in Secured Asset Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has delivered a significant ruling in CR-7563-2019, reinforcing the limited scope of civil court intervention in cases involving the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act). Justice Vikram Aggarwal, in a landmark judgment, upheld the lower courts’ decision to reject a plaint, emphasizing the jurisdictional limitations imposed on civil courts by the SARFAESI Act.

The case, involving Kunal Sharma as the petitioner against Hero Fincorp Ltd. And others, was pivotal in defining the contours of the civil court’s jurisdiction in loan transaction disputes. The petitioner challenged the orders of the lower courts, which had rejected his plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the civil court lacked jurisdiction in light of the SARFAESI Act.

In his ruling, Justice Aggarwal quoted, “To a very limited extent jurisdiction of the civil court can also be invoked, where for example, the action of the secured creditor is alleged to be fraudulent or his claim may be so absurd and untenable which may not require any probe whatsoever.” This statement underscores the High Court’s recognition of the SARFAESI Act’s role in limiting civil court involvement in secured asset disputes.

The judgment also clarified that while allegations of fraud in loan transactions might arise, these issues are predominantly within the purview of the Debts Recovery Tribunal as per the SARFAESI Act. The court noted that accepting such contentions in civil courts could undermine the efficacy of the SARFAESI Act, leading to its provisions being defeated in cases involving loans and guarantees.

The dismissal of the revision petition by the High Court has set a clear precedent that disputes related to enforcement of security interests under the SARFAESI Act fall outside the jurisdiction of civil courts. This decision is expected to streamline the process of loan recovery and enforcement of security interests, reinforcing the authority of the Debts Recovery Tribunal in such matters.

Date of Decision: 28.11.2023

Kunal Sharma VS Hero Fincorp Ltd. and others

 

Latest Legal News