Claims For Recovery Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Supported By Probable Evidence; Exaggerated Claims Unsafe: Kerala High Court Naib Tahsildar Performing Quasi-Judicial Duties Is A 'Judge', Protected From Disciplinary Action For Bonafide Errors: Madhya Pradesh High Court Purchaser Estopped From Refusing Delivery Or Payment Of Statutory Taxes After Participating In Machinery Trial Runs: Madras High Court Presumption Of Marriage From Aadhaar, Passports Is Rebuttable; Long Silence Dislodges Marital Claim: Kerala High Court Government Cannot Deny Promotional Benefits To Employee Who Assumes Charge On The Date Of Superannuation: Karnataka High Court Disproportionate Assets 608% More Than Salary Establish 'Proceeds Of Crime' Prima Facie; No Mini-Trial At Discharge Stage: Jharkhand High Court Decree Based On 'Evasive Denial' Improper If Defendant Raises Specific Defenses Going To Root Of Case: J&K & Ladakh High Court Trial Courts Cannot Adjourn Ad-Interim Injunction Petitions For Months While Ordering 'Urgent Notice': Andhra Pradesh High Court Agent Of Court Receiver Who Breaches Undertaking On Nature Of Business Not Entitled To Occupy Premises Without Paying Royalty: Bombay High Court Criminal Antecedents Of A Witness Do Not Operate As Disqualification, Testimony To Be Assessed With Caution Not Suspicion: Calcutta High Court Bar On Raising Benami Defense Under Section 4 Applies To All Suits Filed After 1988 Act, Even For Past Transactions: Allahabad High Court Article 21 Can Trump UAPA Bail Restrictions In Cases Of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Activist Khuram Parvez Mere Possession Of Jihad Literature Not An Offence; Cannot Be Tagged With Terrorism Without Evidence Of Criminal Act: Telangana High Court

High Court Upholds Jurisdictional Bar of Civil Courts in SARFAESI Act Cases: Limited Scope for Civil Court Intervention in Secured Asset Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has delivered a significant ruling in CR-7563-2019, reinforcing the limited scope of civil court intervention in cases involving the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act). Justice Vikram Aggarwal, in a landmark judgment, upheld the lower courts’ decision to reject a plaint, emphasizing the jurisdictional limitations imposed on civil courts by the SARFAESI Act.

The case, involving Kunal Sharma as the petitioner against Hero Fincorp Ltd. And others, was pivotal in defining the contours of the civil court’s jurisdiction in loan transaction disputes. The petitioner challenged the orders of the lower courts, which had rejected his plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the civil court lacked jurisdiction in light of the SARFAESI Act.

In his ruling, Justice Aggarwal quoted, “To a very limited extent jurisdiction of the civil court can also be invoked, where for example, the action of the secured creditor is alleged to be fraudulent or his claim may be so absurd and untenable which may not require any probe whatsoever.” This statement underscores the High Court’s recognition of the SARFAESI Act’s role in limiting civil court involvement in secured asset disputes.

The judgment also clarified that while allegations of fraud in loan transactions might arise, these issues are predominantly within the purview of the Debts Recovery Tribunal as per the SARFAESI Act. The court noted that accepting such contentions in civil courts could undermine the efficacy of the SARFAESI Act, leading to its provisions being defeated in cases involving loans and guarantees.

The dismissal of the revision petition by the High Court has set a clear precedent that disputes related to enforcement of security interests under the SARFAESI Act fall outside the jurisdiction of civil courts. This decision is expected to streamline the process of loan recovery and enforcement of security interests, reinforcing the authority of the Debts Recovery Tribunal in such matters.

Date of Decision: 28.11.2023

Kunal Sharma VS Hero Fincorp Ltd. and others

 

Latest Legal News