Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

High Court Upholds Importance of Photographic Evidence in Civil Disputes: Relevant for Adjudicating Rival Claims

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of photographic evidence in civil litigation, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon’ble Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has set a precedent in the careful examination and admittance of such evidence in legal disputes.

The judgment, dated November 20, 2023, revolved around a contentious civil suit where the petitioner, Vikas Mohan, sought to introduce three black and white photographs to establish the pre-existence of a structure, termed ‘kholki’, which was at the heart of the dispute. The decision to allow these photographs as evidence came after meticulous consideration of their relevance to the case.

Justice Arora, in her observation, highlighted the significance of these photographs, stating, “the said photographs would be relevant for adjudicating the rival claims of the parties; subject to the Petitioner proving the said photographs in accordance with law.” This statement not only allowed the submission of the photographs into evidence but also set a benchmark for the standard and relevance of photographic evidence in civil litigation.

The judgment further addressed the issue of the delay in submitting evidence, emphasizing that the trial court should consider the impact of this delay on the credibility of the evidence during evaluation. Despite the delay, the court found it imperative to include the photographs for a comprehensive understanding of the case.

The court also imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the petitioner for the procedural delay, reflecting the court’s stance on ensuring adherence to procedural norms and timeliness in legal proceedings.

This decision has been perceived as a significant move in legal circles, as it reinforces the role of photographic evidence in unraveling the truth in legal disputes, especially in civil cases where the burden of proof plays a crucial role.

Date of Decision: 20 November 2023

VIKAS MOHAN  VS RAJINDER SINGH (DECEASED)

Latest Legal News