Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

High Court Upholds Fundamental Right to Personal Liberty in Same-Sex Relationship Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, August 17, 2023* – In a groundbreaking judgement, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has upheld the fundamental right to personal liberty in the context of a same-sex relationship. The case centered around two young adult females who were in a live-in relationship for the past four years and sought protection through the State by invoking their rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Justice Chitkara, in his observations, stated, “Love, attraction, and fondness have no boundaries, and not even the boundary of gender.” He emphasized that Article 21 of the Constitution of India applies irrespective of the gender of individuals involved and that every person within the territory of India has an inherent and indefeasible fundamental right to life, which the State is duty-bound to protect.

The judgement drew upon the Constitutional bench ruling in Mohd Arif @ Ashfaq v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India (2014) 9 SCC 737, which highlighted the origins and significance of Article 21 as a precious fundamental right.

The Court issued a protection order, directing concerned authorities to provide two female police officials to ensure the safety of the petitioners for a span of two weeks, with provisions for extension based on threat analysis or the petitioners’ requests. The order clarified that it was not a blanket bail in any FIR and that it would not hinder any legitimate interrogation or investigation.

“This ruling not only upholds the rights of individuals in same-sex relationships but also underscores the importance of personal liberty as a cornerstone of our democracy,” remarked legal experts. The judgement is being lauded as a significant step forward in recognizing and safeguarding the rights of individuals regardless of their sexual orientation.

The order, while acknowledging the evolving ethos and lifestyles of the younger generations, enforces the State’s responsibility to protect fundamental rights. The judgement has garnered attention for its progressive approach and commitment to ensuring equal protection under the law.

As per the court’s order, the protection granted will eclipse after thirty days, and individuals involved can download a true copy of the judgement from the official web page of the court. Legal scholars expect this judgement to serve as a benchmark in similar cases and contribute to the evolving jurisprudence around personal liberties in India.

Date of Decision: 17.08.2023                      

Pooja and another vs State of  Punjab and others    

Latest Legal News