Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Upholds Fundamental Right to Personal Liberty in Same-Sex Relationship Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, August 17, 2023* – In a groundbreaking judgement, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has upheld the fundamental right to personal liberty in the context of a same-sex relationship. The case centered around two young adult females who were in a live-in relationship for the past four years and sought protection through the State by invoking their rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Justice Chitkara, in his observations, stated, “Love, attraction, and fondness have no boundaries, and not even the boundary of gender.” He emphasized that Article 21 of the Constitution of India applies irrespective of the gender of individuals involved and that every person within the territory of India has an inherent and indefeasible fundamental right to life, which the State is duty-bound to protect.

The judgement drew upon the Constitutional bench ruling in Mohd Arif @ Ashfaq v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India (2014) 9 SCC 737, which highlighted the origins and significance of Article 21 as a precious fundamental right.

The Court issued a protection order, directing concerned authorities to provide two female police officials to ensure the safety of the petitioners for a span of two weeks, with provisions for extension based on threat analysis or the petitioners’ requests. The order clarified that it was not a blanket bail in any FIR and that it would not hinder any legitimate interrogation or investigation.

“This ruling not only upholds the rights of individuals in same-sex relationships but also underscores the importance of personal liberty as a cornerstone of our democracy,” remarked legal experts. The judgement is being lauded as a significant step forward in recognizing and safeguarding the rights of individuals regardless of their sexual orientation.

The order, while acknowledging the evolving ethos and lifestyles of the younger generations, enforces the State’s responsibility to protect fundamental rights. The judgement has garnered attention for its progressive approach and commitment to ensuring equal protection under the law.

As per the court’s order, the protection granted will eclipse after thirty days, and individuals involved can download a true copy of the judgement from the official web page of the court. Legal scholars expect this judgement to serve as a benchmark in similar cases and contribute to the evolving jurisprudence around personal liberties in India.

Date of Decision: 17.08.2023                      

Pooja and another vs State of  Punjab and others    

Latest Legal News