Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

High Court Upholds Fundamental Right to Personal Liberty in Same-Sex Relationship Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, August 17, 2023* – In a groundbreaking judgement, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has upheld the fundamental right to personal liberty in the context of a same-sex relationship. The case centered around two young adult females who were in a live-in relationship for the past four years and sought protection through the State by invoking their rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Justice Chitkara, in his observations, stated, “Love, attraction, and fondness have no boundaries, and not even the boundary of gender.” He emphasized that Article 21 of the Constitution of India applies irrespective of the gender of individuals involved and that every person within the territory of India has an inherent and indefeasible fundamental right to life, which the State is duty-bound to protect.

The judgement drew upon the Constitutional bench ruling in Mohd Arif @ Ashfaq v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India (2014) 9 SCC 737, which highlighted the origins and significance of Article 21 as a precious fundamental right.

The Court issued a protection order, directing concerned authorities to provide two female police officials to ensure the safety of the petitioners for a span of two weeks, with provisions for extension based on threat analysis or the petitioners’ requests. The order clarified that it was not a blanket bail in any FIR and that it would not hinder any legitimate interrogation or investigation.

“This ruling not only upholds the rights of individuals in same-sex relationships but also underscores the importance of personal liberty as a cornerstone of our democracy,” remarked legal experts. The judgement is being lauded as a significant step forward in recognizing and safeguarding the rights of individuals regardless of their sexual orientation.

The order, while acknowledging the evolving ethos and lifestyles of the younger generations, enforces the State’s responsibility to protect fundamental rights. The judgement has garnered attention for its progressive approach and commitment to ensuring equal protection under the law.

As per the court’s order, the protection granted will eclipse after thirty days, and individuals involved can download a true copy of the judgement from the official web page of the court. Legal scholars expect this judgement to serve as a benchmark in similar cases and contribute to the evolving jurisprudence around personal liberties in India.

Date of Decision: 17.08.2023                      

Pooja and another vs State of  Punjab and others    

Similar News