Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

High Court Rules Live-in Relationships Not Eligible for Divorce, Family Court Lacks Jurisdiction: Landmark Judgment

06 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Kerala has ruled that live-in relationships do not qualify for divorce and stated that the Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain such claims. The Honorable Mr. Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and the Honorable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas delivered the judgment on June 8, 2023, emphasizing that marriage must be solemnized in accordance with personal or secular laws to be recognized for divorce purposes.

The court asserted, "The law recognizes divorce as a means of separating a legal marriage. The extra-judicial divorce followed in some communities also got recognition through statutory laws. All other forms of divorce are of statutory nature. The statute only recognizes or allows the parties to divorce if they are married in accordance with the recognized form of marriage applicable as per the personal law or secular law." The judgment further clarified that registration of a relationship alone is not sufficient to establish a legal marriage eligible for divorce.

Furthermore, the High Court concluded that the Family Court does not possess jurisdiction to entertain claims for divorce in cases where the marriage is not legally recognized. The court highlighted that the Family Court Act applies exclusively to marriages recognized by law and does not extend to contracts or agreements of marriage. Consequently, the petition for divorce was declared as not maintainable, and the Family Court was directed to return the petition.

Date of Decision: June 8, 2023

xxx vs xxx 

Latest Legal News