Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

High Court Rules Live-in Relationships Not Eligible for Divorce, Family Court Lacks Jurisdiction: Landmark Judgment

06 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Kerala has ruled that live-in relationships do not qualify for divorce and stated that the Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain such claims. The Honorable Mr. Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and the Honorable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas delivered the judgment on June 8, 2023, emphasizing that marriage must be solemnized in accordance with personal or secular laws to be recognized for divorce purposes.

The court asserted, "The law recognizes divorce as a means of separating a legal marriage. The extra-judicial divorce followed in some communities also got recognition through statutory laws. All other forms of divorce are of statutory nature. The statute only recognizes or allows the parties to divorce if they are married in accordance with the recognized form of marriage applicable as per the personal law or secular law." The judgment further clarified that registration of a relationship alone is not sufficient to establish a legal marriage eligible for divorce.

Furthermore, the High Court concluded that the Family Court does not possess jurisdiction to entertain claims for divorce in cases where the marriage is not legally recognized. The court highlighted that the Family Court Act applies exclusively to marriages recognized by law and does not extend to contracts or agreements of marriage. Consequently, the petition for divorce was declared as not maintainable, and the Family Court was directed to return the petition.

Date of Decision: June 8, 2023

xxx vs xxx 

Latest Legal News