Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

High Court Rules Live-in Relationships Not Eligible for Divorce, Family Court Lacks Jurisdiction: Landmark Judgment

06 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Kerala has ruled that live-in relationships do not qualify for divorce and stated that the Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain such claims. The Honorable Mr. Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and the Honorable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas delivered the judgment on June 8, 2023, emphasizing that marriage must be solemnized in accordance with personal or secular laws to be recognized for divorce purposes.

The court asserted, "The law recognizes divorce as a means of separating a legal marriage. The extra-judicial divorce followed in some communities also got recognition through statutory laws. All other forms of divorce are of statutory nature. The statute only recognizes or allows the parties to divorce if they are married in accordance with the recognized form of marriage applicable as per the personal law or secular law." The judgment further clarified that registration of a relationship alone is not sufficient to establish a legal marriage eligible for divorce.

Furthermore, the High Court concluded that the Family Court does not possess jurisdiction to entertain claims for divorce in cases where the marriage is not legally recognized. The court highlighted that the Family Court Act applies exclusively to marriages recognized by law and does not extend to contracts or agreements of marriage. Consequently, the petition for divorce was declared as not maintainable, and the Family Court was directed to return the petition.

Date of Decision: June 8, 2023

xxx vs xxx 

Similar News