Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

High Court Rules Live-in Relationships Not Eligible for Divorce, Family Court Lacks Jurisdiction: Landmark Judgment

06 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Kerala has ruled that live-in relationships do not qualify for divorce and stated that the Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain such claims. The Honorable Mr. Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and the Honorable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas delivered the judgment on June 8, 2023, emphasizing that marriage must be solemnized in accordance with personal or secular laws to be recognized for divorce purposes.

The court asserted, "The law recognizes divorce as a means of separating a legal marriage. The extra-judicial divorce followed in some communities also got recognition through statutory laws. All other forms of divorce are of statutory nature. The statute only recognizes or allows the parties to divorce if they are married in accordance with the recognized form of marriage applicable as per the personal law or secular law." The judgment further clarified that registration of a relationship alone is not sufficient to establish a legal marriage eligible for divorce.

Furthermore, the High Court concluded that the Family Court does not possess jurisdiction to entertain claims for divorce in cases where the marriage is not legally recognized. The court highlighted that the Family Court Act applies exclusively to marriages recognized by law and does not extend to contracts or agreements of marriage. Consequently, the petition for divorce was declared as not maintainable, and the Family Court was directed to return the petition.

Date of Decision: June 8, 2023

xxx vs xxx 

Latest Legal News