Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief Just Giving a Call for Protest Doesn’t Make One Criminally Liable - Rail Roko Protest Quashed Against KCR Ex-CM: Telangana High Court Ends 13-Year-Old Proceedings for 2011 Telangana Agitation This Is Not a Case of Greed Simplicitor but a Celebration of Fraud: Karnataka High Court Grants Specific Performance, Slams Vendor for Violating Court Orders

"High Court Rejects Quashing Plea in Disproportionate Assets Case, Emphasizes Timely Investigation"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition seeking the quashing of FIR in a disproportionate assets case, highlighting the importance of timely investigations. The case involved Dr. Kallappa, a former university professor, who had been under investigation for alleged misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, observed, "The delay has occasioned due to the petitioner not divulging numerous accounts held by him. Unearthing of those accounts by the prosecution is one of the reasons for delay." The court noted that such delays can lead to a lackadaisical attitude on the part of the prosecution and adversely affect the rights of the accused.

Dr. Kallappa's petition argued that the pending criminal proceedings were preventing him from applying for the post of Vice-Chancellor, and therefore, the proceedings should be quashed. However, the court rejected this plea, emphasizing that the delay was, in part, due to the petitioner's failure to disclose all relevant information.

The judge stated, "The petitioner is required to set his house in order by directing completion of investigation within a time frame, failing which the Damocles sword of prosecution will always be hanging on the head of the public servant."

The High Court ordered the Lokayukta, the anti-corruption ombudsman in Karnataka, to file its final report within two months from the date of the court's order. It warned

Date of Decision:   August 10, 2023

KALLAPPA vs THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Similar News