Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

"High Court Rejects Quashing Plea in Disproportionate Assets Case, Emphasizes Timely Investigation"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition seeking the quashing of FIR in a disproportionate assets case, highlighting the importance of timely investigations. The case involved Dr. Kallappa, a former university professor, who had been under investigation for alleged misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna, presiding over the case, observed, "The delay has occasioned due to the petitioner not divulging numerous accounts held by him. Unearthing of those accounts by the prosecution is one of the reasons for delay." The court noted that such delays can lead to a lackadaisical attitude on the part of the prosecution and adversely affect the rights of the accused.

Dr. Kallappa's petition argued that the pending criminal proceedings were preventing him from applying for the post of Vice-Chancellor, and therefore, the proceedings should be quashed. However, the court rejected this plea, emphasizing that the delay was, in part, due to the petitioner's failure to disclose all relevant information.

The judge stated, "The petitioner is required to set his house in order by directing completion of investigation within a time frame, failing which the Damocles sword of prosecution will always be hanging on the head of the public servant."

The High Court ordered the Lokayukta, the anti-corruption ombudsman in Karnataka, to file its final report within two months from the date of the court's order. It warned

Date of Decision:   August 10, 2023

KALLAPPA vs THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Latest Legal News